John Paul II Octopus Dei leash on Andrew Greeley

Opus Dei is advancing in their WORLD DOMINATION AGENDA in the USA:
1) The Voice of the Faithful alas has become the Voice of Opus Dei securely in place with their new team of national officers (secret members of Opus Dei)
2) VOTF outgoing chair Bill Casey and Board of Trustees wrote a letter to "distance itself from Fr. Tom Doyle" on the eve of national elections, Opus Dei did not want to take any chance on the elections...inspite of their THe Mole in VOTF Janet Hauter who never replied our relevant questions.
3) Fr. Richard McBrien, the St. Thomas Acquinas of the 20th century is their Opus Dei mouthpiece
4) Opus Dei used and then fired 'without reason' Jesuit Fr. Fessio who helped them build their 1-Billion Ave Maria University in Naples Florida and secure its accreditation. Opus Dei has no sense of gratitude, they treat people like animals, elephants, servants and slaves.(links to come)
5) Mother Angelica with her Blood Diamond Chapel and EWTN is the (invisible) Radio of Opus Dei in the USA
6) Fr. Andrew Greeley becomes a defender of the Opus Dei-John Paul II Pedophile Priests Army

Opus Dei operates like a snake, subtle, secret, slimy who media spin through the best writers they can find. Andrew Greeley is one most famous Jesuit writer and has been tied on his foot by an Octopus Dei leash -- very subtly like a tamed elephant like his confreres in the General Congregation 35 in Rome. How do Opus Dei do it? Simple really, by buying their souls (they own the Vatican Euro1.6 Trillion treasury and billions) and by seducing them with the Opus Dei apple......by their fruit you shall know them......these bought-souls go on to defend the John Paul II King of Pedophilia. Lawyer Marci Hamilton points it out in this her recent article on how Andrew Greeley defend the church's JPIIPPA John Paul II Pedophile Priests Army thereby, he serves the Opus Dei WORLD DOMINATION AGENDA.














How to Solve the Appalling Problem of Child Sex Abuse: Why Catholic Priest Andrew Greeley Is Very Wrong to Suggest Church Self-Policing Is the Answer
Marci Hamilton

Last week, the Chicago Sun Times published an Op Ed by sociologist, novelist, and Roman Catholic Church priest Andrew Greeley, entitled "Celibacy Isn't Cause of Sex Abuse." Greeley is right on that point, but he is also extremely misguided about the scourge of child sex abuse in this country, as I will explain.

Greeley states in his Op Ed, "I contend that the problem will be solved only when priests assume full responsibility for self-policing. The current response of many a priest is to wash their hands of the crimes and blame the bishops…."

These sentences, written by an important public intellectual within the Church who has been critical of the hierarchy's handling of abuse, deserve very close analysis.

"The Problem" as Greeley Defines It

First, when Greeley refers to "the problem," he is talking about the hierarchy's evil pattern of covering up child abuse by clergy, and about the dead silence of fellow priests who knew full well that their cohorts were taking children into their bedrooms and to their vacation homes. No decent human being should ever lose his or her initial revulsion at the accounts of children being offered up to predators again and again, over decades. It is not a "problem" - it is debased behavior that should not be known to man.

The real problem, though, is not about the Church - it's about all the victims. And responsibility rests upon our entire society. We have created a legal and social system that has permitted predators in robes, predators behind school desks, and predators in the home to dominate and abuse the utterly defenseless. Reliable studies show that at least one in five children has been sexually abused - and plenty of experts say that number is too low. No more than 10% of those victims ever get to court before the statutes of limitations have expired, and as a result, the adults' depraved behavior is hidden and abetted.

There is no such thing as an accident of this magnitude. Rather, the system has been constructed to favor the adults at the expense of the children. We have choices, but only a very few states have had the guts to flip the balance, placing children's interests above those of adults. The Catholic Church hierarchy's actions are just one example among millions of the ways in which children have been subjected to conditions that permit and encourage abuse. (bold emphasis added)

To put it succinctly, while the Church hierarchy has been an active participant in the pattern of abuse, it is one cog within a larger social pattern. Focus, like Greeley's, on the Church, does not begin to speak to what needs to be done to protect children.

The Narcissism of Relying on "Self-Policing" by Priests

If there were any point that a person of Greeley's obvious intelligence should have apprehended by now, I would have thought that it would be this one: There is no such thing as the successful "self-policing" of child abuse. Child molesters are too devious, dogged, and charming to be contained by any private system. Self-policing is a chimera, if not a contradiction in terms: When it comes to protecting children, it is nothing but self-indulgence.

The only cover it provides is for an organization's ugly secrets. The impulse to self-police by Chicago's Cardinal Francis George (also President of the United States Conference of Catholic Bishops) was disastrous for the boys recently abused after he let others within the Church "monitor" Fr. David McCormack rather than turn him into authorities. And this happened well after the bishops promised to report abuse to the authorities. Only the legal authorities can "contain" child abusers, and even that system is far from perfect.

Perhaps by "self-policing," Greeley means the church process of defrocking. What a joke. One of the sickest pedophiles within the church to date, Fr. David Sicoli, whose crimes were detailed in the Philadelphia Grand Jury Report on the Philadelphia Archdiocese, was defrocked just last week, which is a good six years after the Boston Globe first broke the coverup story and over two years following the Grand Jury Report - and thus decades after the hierarchy started hearing about him.

And here is the result of this fabulous example of self-policing: If we're talking about protecting the Church from scandal, defrocking was good for the Church, generating some positive publicity and making the Church appear to be taking action. However, it was disastrous for everyone else's children, as no one seems to know where Sicoli is now. Because the Church never turned him into the authorities, he's not in jail, he's not on any Megan's Law list, and he's free to continue his predatory ways.

Greeley poses the ultimate narcissistic question: Does celibacy cause child abuse? By itself? Of course not. No single policy has created this state of affairs. Rather, it takes an entire society and, in the case of the Church, the orchestration of an entire organization, to permit and foster the widespread child sex abuse we now face.

Where Are The Priests? When Many Must Have Suspected Others' Abuse, Why Have So Few Come Forward?
Greeley makes a good, though muted, point about the culpability of clergy in general: Was it really just the bishops who created this situation? A few clergy members have been brave witnesses to the corruption that has led to the abuse of children within the Church, but they have been hounded and demoted as well, including Bishop Thomas Gumbleton, Fr. Thomas Doyle, and Sister Maureen Turlish. Most of the rest are silent, as Greeley points out, apparently hoping that the problem will fix itself or worse, praying that no one will learn about their dealings with children.

You can be certain that plenty of priests suspected their fellow clergymen, or knew them to be unstable in seminary, but did nothing to prevent the inevitable abuse. According to Greeley, they need to do a better job of "self-policing." Quite to the contrary, they need to move beyond the internal dynamics of the organization and call the police.

Who Cares What the Church Has to Say About Child Sex Abuse, Anyway?

Finally, I have to wonder at the Sun Times' decision to publish Greeley's Op Ed in the first place. The Church's seemingly intractable internal problems are old news at this point.

Who cares what the Church has to say about child abuse, anyway? You don't see the hierarchy taking any steps to ensure that all children are protected or floating new ideas about how to transform all of society to make this a better place for children. The focus remains where Greeley's is - inside the institution. This navel-gazing is a distraction from the pressing need to protect all children now.

Even if the Church were to take care of every one of its victims perfectly (which will never happen), and were to never permit another child to be abused (ditto), it would have taken care of only a small percentage of the total number of children abused in this country. And even if it screened perfectly every priest on its doorstep, the problem transcends the Church.

Many more children are abused within the home, and plenty are abused in the schools. The breaking news is that there is a growing national grassroots movement for all victims of child sex abuse.

As I've written in previous columns such as this one, and as I explain in my forthcoming book, Justice Denied: What America Must Do to Protect Its Children, there is one change in public policy that will do more to protect children from future abuse and to bring justice to the millions currently suffering outside locked courthouse doors than any other: the simple fix of eliminating the statutes of limitations for child sex abuse.

The Church hierarchy is implacably opposed to such reform. Let me repeat myself - who cares?

Marci A. Hamilton is a Visiting Professor of Public Affairs and the Kathleen and Martin Crane Senior Research Fellow at the Program in Law and Public Affairs at Princeton University. An archive of her columns on church/state issues - as well as other topics -- can be found on this site. Professor Hamilton's most recent work is God vs. the Gavel: Religion and the Rule of Law (Cambridge University Press 2005), now available in paperback. Professor Hamilton's forthcoming book, which will be published this spring is entitled Justice Denied: What America Must Do to Protect Its Children (Cambridge 2008). Professor Hamilton's email address is Hamilton02@aol.com.

------
Chicago Sun Times

Celibacy isn't cause of sex abuse

February 13, 2008

ANDREW GREELEY
agreel@aol.com

A couple of weeks ago I challenged the conventional wisdom of some Catholic liberals that celibacy is the cause of sexual abuse of children and young people by priests. I pointed out that it was also a problem for married Protestant clergy. What was unique for Catholics was the cover-up by church authorities -- a strategy that worked for a long, long time. Celibacy does not cause abuse, and marriage is not a cure for it.

I was deluged with hate mail from angry priests and laity. It was obvious, they ranted, that celibacy was the cause of abuse. Yet a Greek Orthodox priest wrote me an e-mail asserting that "even the married Greek clergy are not immune from pedophilia." He referred me to the Web page the Orthodox Church maintains about its problems, www.ortho doxreform.org. My ranting critics ridiculed my sociological data about the professional and personal happiness of priests in comparison with ministers. I suggest they look up the Greek Web page.

The Greeks are transparent about their problems. They don't seem to rally around their offenders in protective circles of denial. Quite the contrary, they seem to distance themselves from the abusers. They don't argue, as I heard several years ago from an Irish priest, "Father, they are PRIESTS!"

I contend that the problem will be solved only when priests assume full responsibility for self-policing. The current response of many priests is to wash their hands of the crimes and blame the bishops while at the same time they demand the abolition of obligatory celibacy. Their crusade against celibacy -- and by implications against celibates -- is a cover-up for their failure to protect children and young people in the past.

It may well be that celibacy should be optional if only to attract more young people to priestly vocations. I wonder, however, how many young women would want to be married to a priest in the Church today. The Catholic Church is in a gosh awful mess, mainly because the Roman Curia has, in the words of the London Tablet, aborted the reforms of the Vatican Council and concentrated all power in itself. The great -- and reasonable -- hopes of the council have been blighted, not permanently indeed, but temporarily. Once an admired and respected profession (vocation, if you will), the priesthood is now in disgrace. It remains to be demonstrated that married priests could restore the image of the clergy and the morale of the laity.

A young man who considers the priesthood today has to make a strong act of faith that it would be a happy choice. Nor is the restoration of the Latin mass likely to have much of an effect, despite the starry-eyed conviction that it will undo some of the effects of the council. Those who wish to revoke the council seem blithely unaware that you can't do that, and it is blind folly to try.

In fact, the priesthood would be a happy choice if one takes seriously the empirical data. But who takes such data seriously in this era of Grand Ideology and Grand Ideologues?

Both the married life and the celibate life have their advantages and disadvantages. Both callings are honorable and difficult. Both are pleasing to God. Both have their problems and both have their graces.

At one time clericalist ideology demeaned the calling of the married laity. Now a more recent ideology demeans the calling of the celibate clergy. It is time for this silly and immature confrontation to stop.

John Paul II Octopus Dei swallows VOTF...and make it VOOD Voice of Opus Dei in America

Breaking News: Opus Dei trembles before Fr. Tom Doyle and Benedict XVI trembles before GISU! The Benedict XVI-Opus Dei B16-OD Titanic Ship has been hit by the Galileo Iceberg!

Fr. Tom Doyle is "THE Conscience of Our Age"

Opus Dei trembles before Fr. Tom Doyle because he is the star witness against the canonization of John Paul II, the poster boy of Opus Dei and mystical husband of St? Josemaria Escriva. As long as Fr. Tom Doyle is alive and well, Opus Dei tremble and cannot sleep at night -- they know that they cannot canonize and say "John Paul II did not know about his more than 5,500 American pedophile-priests sexually abusing more than 12,000 American boys and girls". Fr. Tom Doyle is THE living "Conscience of Our Age"...it isn't Benedict XVI who claims to be that conscience as we exposed in our Benedict XVI weblog "Benedict XVI the FAULTY Conscience of our age".

So Opus Dei is glad it has swallowed the VOTF and will make it the American version of VOOD Voice of Opus Dei among the laity who are not "official" members of Opus Dei. But it will be run by secret Opus Dei members such as in the newly elected team (see list below) of The Mole Janet Hauter, Vice-President.

Proofs of Opus Dei strategic conquest of VOTF to expand their WORLD DOMINATION agenda

It is not a surprise that The Mole of Opus Dei whom we have pointed out has won - with her team - the VOTF National Elections. These are the 4 biggest proofs that the Octopus Dei has strategically (and successfully) swallowed the VOTF Voice of The Faithful. We will post more in days and months to come as these Opus Dei footsoldiers will show their true colors and their "American-Domination agenda" on behalf of Opus Dei - as elected VOTF officers.

1. Fr. Richard McBrien at VOTF National Convention

Last October 2006 at the VOTF convention, Fr. Richard McBrien was the main VOTF speaker and he equates the (alive) Opus Dei priest Fr. McCloskey as equal to Bishop Fulton Sheen. This was our coverage which shook the daylight out of the faithful. Opus Dei's media spins are so subtle like snakes...they thought no one would spot McBrien's Opus Dei tricks....but we exposed them in clear daylight.

Bishop Fulton Sheen whom the Opus Dei are helping to be beatified in the Vatican Opus Dei saint-factory.

Opus Dei priest McCloskey of the Catholic Information Center in Washington DC. He controls prominent American Opus Dei members through their weekly (or more often) confessions, Opus Dei members such as Supreme Court judges Scalia, Clemens, Roberts, billionaires like Tom Monighan, etc.

2. The outgoing VOTF Chair, Bill Casey, and Board of Trustees "distance VOTF from Fr. Tom Doyle" on the eve of VOTF National Elections. This final act of Bill Casey and Boad Members prove that they are secret Opus Dei members obeying orders from Opus Dei. Opus Dei wanted to show America that Fr. Tom Doyle has been cut off from VOTF - for good- and did not want to take any chances with the election of a new team of officers at VOTF. But the balloting is questionable as was raised by Paul Kenricks - (see number 3 below of 'questions to candidates' that were left unanswered)...the election of 2008-VOTF oficers are as questionable as the canonization of Opus Dei founder St? Josemaria Escriva! See the pattern of Octopus Dei lies?

Last January 8, 2008 Fr. Tom Doyle wrote a letter to the VOTF to help them in their upcoming National Elections.

In reply to Tom Doyle's letter to VOTF, on the eve of the VOTF National Elections, Bill Casey, the Chair and the Board of Trustees of the VOTF wrote a public letter "to distance VOTF from Fr. Tom Doyle". This was the biggest omen of the Opus Dei's TOTAL control on the VOTF. Therefore, all the candidates that Tom Doyle supported in public were discredited along with him and the Opus Dei candidates were elected.

The St. John the Baptist Voice of Fr. Tom Doyle

The mighty King Herod trembled at the voice and message of the imprisoned and poor St. John the Baptist. Likewise, the mighty Octopus Dei trembles at the message and voice of Fr. Tom Doyle, the star witness of the John Paul II mortal sin because he was the main leader in the cover-up of the 26 years John Paul II Pedophile Priests Army.

Let us always remember:

Victims - Attackers - Responsible Leaders

Pearl Harbor - 3,000 victims - 170 planes - Admiral Yamamoto

WTC & 9/11 attacks - 5,000 victims - 19 Muslims - Osama bin Laden

USA Priest Pedophilia - 12,000 victims - 5,448 priests - John Paul II + Benedict XVI + St? Josemaria de Opus Dei (the new Roman Catholic Trinity!)


Fr. Tom Doyle makes the Opus Dei tremble because he is the star witness to John Paul II's mortal sin that cannot make JP2 a "saint". With the Devil's Advocate abolished by John Paul II -- he abolished it to expedite the canonization of St? Josemaria Escriva at his Vatican saint-factory -- Fr. Tom Doyle is the main prophet, the 20th century St. John the Baptist who originally and has continuously informed John Paul II that his Pedophile Priests Army would cost the Church more than a billion dollars. Tom Doyle's prophecy came true and it has cost the American Church 3 Billion dollars up to today and still counting. This does not include the other poor countries who don't have American lawyers like we do who can afford to work for victims at their own millions of dollars expense.

So today, we can safely say that the John Paul II Voice of Octopus Dei has swallowed the VOTF, and all we can expect is some fairy tale VOTF chanting Latin Mass and "pretending" to fight for women -priest ordination that will NEVER be heard in Rome or seen in this century. The Octopus Dei has swallowed VOTF and all that VOTF will do is "pretend" to be the voice of the faithful, but to be more precise, to be the VOOD Voice of Opus Dei.

Octopus Dei may have won over the VOTF but Opus Dei will always tremble before Tom Doyle -- who is the ONLY conscience left standing to defy the canonization of John Paul II. The Opus Dei founder St? Josemaria with the Hitler-genius captured the Vatican, the Vatican Bank, and the Conference of Bishops and Cardinals worldwide. That is the snake's strategy: Capture the Head and you've captured the whole body. The Opus Dei are in all judiciary systems, Scalia, Clemens, Roberts,in USA Supreme Court. In England, they've converted Tony Blair into becoming a Catholic. The Opus Dei WORLD DOMINATION AGENDA seems to be succeeding, but as long as Tom Doyle's voice is heard, they cannot canonize John Paul II who is guilty in the crime-of-cover-up of more than 10,000 American children victims of his John Paul II Pedophile Priests Army.

The strategy of Opus Dei is to silence Fr. Tom Doyle by removing ALL organizations that recognize him, especially VOTF Voice of the Faithful. The next organization Opus Dei want to convince to "distance itself from Tom Doyle" is SNAP. Opus Dei is slowly but surely trying to get BishopsAccountability and Abuse Tracker to delete its files. Watch out for a "sudden" blackout and "accidental deletion" of files in the world wide web! We are saving all our posts in bloggers in case it is infiltrated by some Opus Dei technicians who will "accidentally delete" our weblogs!

Opus Dei want Tom Doyle's head in a silver platter and VOTF has delivered that to them. Luckily, in today's Google Age, Tom Doyle's voice will continue to resound in The John Paul II Millstone and his books and websites.














3. The Opus Dei Mole in VOTF

Last January 21, 2008, we pointed out The Mole in VOTF, Janet Hauter, candidate for Vice-President. To our shock, her son George Bouchey has the most bitter voice among all those who posted questions to candidates (see his posts below). Our questions were left on the VOTF site but they were all deleted 2 days before the final voting last February 22. We re post them here to show what Janet Hauter and George Bouchey refused to answer. Opus Dei control their members in secrecy within the confessional and their members obey blindly.

With the team of Janet Hauter having won, we now know that VOTF electors are mostly Opus Dei members. No one in their right mind would vote for Janet Hauter who cannot answer our "pure questions" that strike to the heart of VOTF -- the defense of the victims of priest-pedophilia. Our questions are reposted below.

Questions asked to "The Mole" Janet Hauter

Author: Janet Hauter

#93—Marie Tupper Says:

Dear Ms. Hauter,

A certain blogspot (http://jp2m.blogspot.com/2008/01/john-paul-ii-clone-cardinal-george-and.html) is accusing you of being a member of Opus Dei.
Are you a member of Opus Dei, or in any way associated with Opus Dei?

Marie, I find this bizarre/preposterous question a clone of the private correspondence exchange I had with Paul Kendrick recently. Because I believe in total transparency and have no fear of his “Johnny one note” rants, I offer them to you exactly as was discussed.

(Edited out repeat of OD-Mole clues above. Bold emphasis added))

I consulted with Mother Angelica on this and she said that moles can only be identified by people who have their heads in the dirt. She also said “It’s naughty to slander and the accuser needs to do penance!” Janet Hauter

Paul Kendrick writes: Please stop being silly. Just answer the simple question. Are you a member of, or in any way associated with Opus Dei?

Secondly, the Ignatius Group message was distributed only to you and your son, George Bouchey. I wanted to first determine what your reaction would be. However, if you do not respond to the question about whether or not you are an Opus Dei member (or in any way associated with Opus Dei ; i.e., is your spouse a member?), then I will publish the link to the blog and your refusal to answer the question.

Janet Hauter’s post:
SLANDER/LIBEL

A type of defamation. Slander is an untruthful oral (spoken) statement about a person that harms the person’s reputation. Because slander is a tort (a civil wrong), the injured person can bring a lawsuit against the person who made the false statement. If the statement is made via broadcast media — for example, over the radio or on TV — it is considered libel, rather than slander, because the statement has the potential to reach a very wide audience.

Subject: Why are you so upset about a simple question? You need to take a deep breath.
Date: 1/26/2008 3:41:56 P.M. Central Standard Time
From: IgnatiusGroup
Reply To:
To: JMWHauter

Janet Hauter’s post: The question is ludicrous. I am not now, never have been, have no relatives that are or would ever consider membership in Opus Dei. Bizarre question.

Do whatever you need to do. This conversation is closed. J

-

Paris Arrows questions to Janet Hauter


Paris Says:

February 7th, 2008 at 8:22 am

Paris Arrow, author of The Mole in VOTF and Mother Angelica & VOTF in http://www.jp2m.blogspot.com question to Janet Hauter:

1) In your #130 reply (to my question #121) you said: “I make no judgements about correspondence from other organizations. I addressed only VOTF issues which I better know than other organizations” — shows you are a recluse candidate (driven by only one hidden OD agenda) — which I would add as The-Mole-in-VOTF-clue-number-9 to my list http://jp2m.blogspot.com/2008/01/john-paul-ii-clone-cardinal-george-and.html .

Aren’t you aware that SNAP and VOTF recently TOGETHER wrote a letter http://pope-ratz.blogspot.com/2008/01/snap-demands-cardinal-laws-resignation.html to Pope Benedict XVI demanding that Cardinal Bernard Law resign before the pope’s visit to USA this coming April ? You said that “demanding Cardinal George to resign is hollow, empty and meaningless” therefore, do you likewise find this unified letter of SNAP and VOTF to the pope hollow, empty and meaningless?

130
jhauter Says:

February 6th, 2008 at 9:42 pm

#121: Paris Says:

Personally, to me, statements (asking for Cardinal George’s resignation or making a statement about women) is hollow, empty and meaningless. It’s action that I support but action that is based on hard data!

1) What exactly are the hard data you are waiting for — hasn’t Bishops Accountability provided enough ‘hard data’?
I can only respond locally. After a year of research using SNAP data and BA data compared and contrasted to Archdiocesan data, we found the Archdiocese reported slightly over 60% of the predator priests we uncovered. We are still doing research but we also found that some parishes (and zip codes) had multiple sequential and (in some cases) simultaneous predators assigned either to the same parish or in proximity. We will assess trends when data collection is complete.

I make no judgments about correspondence from other organizations. I addressed only VOTF issues which I know better than other organizations.
Janet Hauter, Candidate for Vice President

127
jhauter Says:

February 6th, 2008 at 4:59 pm

If you haven’t garnered already I am an action oriented individual. Calling for Cardinal George’s resignation will achieve nothing but a small obscure place in the media. The Cardinal will only dig his heels in further to reinforce the clerical culture. I’ve met with him, I’ve talked to him on the phone. Chicago solutions were tailored to the issues and facts presented. The story is not over. There was never any negotiation with Cardinal George and that myth has been beaten to death–it is simply a misunderstanding of what happened in our two hour meeting with him. It began with a contentious tone on his part and ended with him inviting us back.

140

Paris Says:

February 8th, 2008 at 11:45 pm

Question to George Bouchey in #138 (February 8th, 2008 at 10:23 pm)

So, George Bouchey, you are the son of Janet Hauter and by your tone you are one hell of a campaigner… but did you know that you are clue #10 in The Mole in VOTF because of the way you signed your name with “pax” ? Pax is the Latin Opus Dei standard greetings among members.

Cited the word “PAX” in your post #46
george bouchey Says:
January 19th, 2008 at 8:56 pm

Welcome, Marie without a full name. Hmm, I sense underneath your sleazy slander an “old friend” who has supplied us with similar posts. Is Marie your real name?
Are you a VotF member? Or is it just an alias used for harrassing nice, honest people who aren’t afraid to identify themselves? Is there an honest question in your two post? Perhaps you would try again and be at least a little honest. Give us a reason to pay attention to you!
pax - george bouchey

Cited that you are the “son of candidate Janet Hauter” in her own #96 Janet Hauter Says: (quoting Paul within her reply)
January 27th, 2008 at 12:18 pm

Paul Kendrick writes: Please stop being silly. Just answer the simple question. Are you a member of, or in any way associated with Opus Dei?
Secondly, the Ignatius Group message was distributed only to you and your son, George Bouchey. I wanted to first determine what your reaction would be. However, if you do not respond to the question about whether or not you are an Opus Dei member (or in any way associated with Opus Dei ; i.e., is your spouse a member?), then I will publish the link to the blog and your refusal to answer the question.

Janet Hauter’s reply:
SLANDER/LIBEL …
The question is ludicrous…

(Bold emphasis added)

—------
Well, George Bouchey, perhaps you can help your mother Janet Hauter answer this very important and more relevant question and pertinent matter (than your endless bickering against Paul Kendrick and others):

#131 February 7th, 2008 at 8:22 am

Paris Arrow, author of The Mole in VOTF and Mother Angelica & VOTF in http://www.jp2m.blogspot.com question to Janet Hauter:

1) In your #130 reply (to my question #121) you said: “I make no judgements about correspondence from other organizations. I addressed only VOTF issues which I better know than other organizations” — shows you are a recluse candidate (driven by only one hidden OD agenda) — which I would add as The-Mole-in-VOTF-clue-number-9 to my list http://jp2m.blogspot.com/2008/01/john-paul-ii-clone-cardinal-george-and.html .

Aren’t you aware that SNAP and VOTF recently TOGETHER wrote a letter http://pope-ratz.blogspot.com/2008/01/snap-demands-cardinal-laws-resignation.html to Pope Benedict XVI demanding that Cardinal Bernard Law resign before the pope’s visit to USA this coming April ? You said that “demanding Cardinal George to resign is hollow, empty and meaningless” therefore, do you likewise find this unified letter of SNAP and VOTF to the pope hollow, empty and meaningless?
February 19. 2008
Questions for Candidates
Use the form below to submit a question for any and all candidates.

184
Paris Says:

February 18th, 2008 at 11:26 am

Hey Janet Hauter, you - your team mates candidates -footsoldiers of Opus Dei and their Opus Dei blueprint for VOTF — and your son George Bouchey owe VOTF the answer to this FUNDAMENTAL question:

Question from 12 DAYS AGO
#131 February 7th, 2008 at 8:22 am

Paris Arrow, author of The Mole in VOTF and Mother Angelica & VOTF in http://www.jp2m.blogspot.com question to Janet Hauter:

In your #130 reply (to my question #121) you said: “I make no judgements about correspondence from other organizations. I addressed only VOTF issues which I better know than other organizations” — shows you are a recluse candidate (driven by only one hidden OD agenda) — which I would add as The-Mole-in-VOTF-clue-number-9 to my list http://jp2m.blogspot.com/2008/01/john-paul-ii-clone-cardinal-george-and.html .

Aren’t you aware that SNAP and VOTF recently TOGETHER wrote a letter http://pope-ratz.blogspot.com/2008/01/snap-demands-cardinal-laws-resignation.html to Pope Benedict XVI demanding that Cardinal Bernard Law resign before the pope’s visit to USA this coming April ? You said that “demanding Cardinal George to resign is hollow, empty and meaningless” therefore, do you likewise find this unified letter of SNAP and VOTF to the pope hollow, empty and meaningless?

Janet Hauter, is your secret agenda to make VOTF the laity’s VOOP Voice of Opus Dei? And are you - and your team mates - going to always run to Mother Angelica for advice and pray at her Blood Diamond chapel ?

How many women members of VOTF can afford to wear a one-carat diamond ring or at least a 0.25 carat on their finger…while Mother Angelica has $50 Million worth of diamonds and jewels within her monastery in Alabama? complete article in http://jp2m.blogspot.com/2008/02/john-paul-ii-diamond-bride-mother.html

Paris Says:

February 11th, 2008 at 9:26 pm

Your comment is awaiting moderation.

Janet Hauter, you and your son George Bouchey owe VOTF the answer to this FUNDAMENTAL question:

#131 February 7th, 2008 at 8:22 am

Paris Arrow, author of The Mole in VOTF and Mother Angelica & VOTF in http://www.jp2m.blogspot.com question to Janet Hauter:

1) In your #130 reply (to my question #121) you said: "I make no judgements about correspondence from other organizations. I addressed only VOTF issues which I better know than other organizations" — shows you are a recluse candidate (driven by only one hidden OD agenda) — which I would add as The-Mole-in-VOTF-clue-number-9 to my list http://jp2m.blogspot.com/2008/01/john-paul-ii-clone-cardinal-george-and.html .

Aren't you aware that SNAP and VOTF recently TOGETHER wrote a letter http://pope-ratz.blogspot.com/2008/01/snap-demands-cardinal-laws-resignation.html to Pope Benedict XVI demanding that Cardinal Bernard Law resign before the pope's visit to USA this coming April ? You said that "demanding Cardinal George to resign is hollow, empty and meaningless" therefore, do you likewise find this unified letter of SNAP and VOTF to the pope hollow, empty and meaningless?

——

CHECKMATE– to Janet Hauter and team …and son George Bouchey -who has the most bitter voice and foul language in VOTF!
VOTF should be ashamed for having George Bouchey as a member and monopolizing in unChristian manner VOTF forums such as this)

Janet Hauter, why don't you simply withdraw your candidacy and spare the "muting" of VOTF by Benedict XVI & Opus Dei http://www.jp2m.blogspot.com/



Paris Says:

February 13th, 2008 at 7:26 am

Your comment is awaiting moderation.

Hey Janet Hauter, you - your team mates candidates -footsoldiers of Opus Dei and their Opus Dei blueprint for VOTF — and your son George Bouchey owe VOTF the answer to this FUNDAMENTAL question:

Question from A WEEK AGO
#131 February 7th, 2008 at 8:22 am

Paris Arrow, author of The Mole in VOTF and Mother Angelica & VOTF in http://www.jp2m.blogspot.com question to Janet Hauter:

1) In your #130 reply (to my question #121) you said: "I make no judgements about correspondence from other organizations. I addressed only VOTF issues which I better know than other organizations" — shows you are a recluse candidate (driven by only one hidden OD agenda) — which I would add as The-Mole-in-VOTF-clue-number-9 to my list http://jp2m.blogspot.com/2008/01/john-paul-ii-clone-cardinal-george-and.html .

Aren't you aware that SNAP and VOTF recently TOGETHER wrote a letter http://pope-ratz.blogspot.com/2008/01/snap-demands-cardinal-laws-resignation.html to Pope Benedict XVI demanding that Cardinal Bernard Law resign before the pope's visit to USA this coming April ? You said that "demanding Cardinal George to resign is hollow, empty and meaningless" therefore, do you likewise find this unified letter of SNAP and VOTF to the pope hollow, empty and meaningless?

Janet Hauter and team mates, why don't you simply withdraw your candidacy and spare the "muting" of VOTF by Benedict XVI & Opus Dei http://www.jp2m.blogspot.com/

How can VOTF "Keep the Faith and Change the Church" when - through you - it is the Voice of Opus Dei and its petrified forest 2,000 year old dogmas and doctrines?


----
george bouchey Says:

February 11th, 2008 at 9:10 pm

Tom et al,

Perhaps the principle to consider is related to the story about whether it is better to give people fish, and feed them for a day, or teach them to fish, and feed them for a lifetime.

I submit we have to do both without so concentrating on one that all others fall by the wayside. Consider honestly whether or not VotF can ever supply the support to victims/survivors that an organization like SNAP can. And there are other organizations with similar missions. Only supporting victims/survivors is akin to feeding the faithful for a day. Yes, it must be done. No, it is not enough in itself. Attempting to change the institution that victimized them is just as worthy a goal, and it must be attempted to eliminate as near as possible to none the future abuse of children. We may not see substantial results immediately, but like a long journey, it starts with a single step. When you look at the existing reform orgs, VotF is the one with a unique and balanced program.

If you want a balanced program, it is neceasary to have a balanced administration and membership. "There's no free lunch, you get what you pay for, and nothin's gonna come in the mail"
georgebouchey@comcast.net


-------

The son of Janet Hauter campaigning on the last day of VOTF election of National Officers: George Bouchey's February 24's posts. George wanted to have the last word and he got it. We posted how George is a major sign of The Mole in VOTF

Author: george bouchey
Comment:
How drol is the last comment from PK! Even amusing!! At last it is disclosed that the knowledge of "ad hominem'' is known to the leader of the select group breathing the rareified and negative charged air of the NE.
It's hard to be a "wannabe". So difficult to be beyond the fringe of membership in the once scorned organizatiion to which one can only re-aspire as one who once was, is not and never will be!
Many are called, few are chosen, even fewer re-chosen. C'est le vie! Au revoir!!



Author: Marie Tupper
Comment:
George Bouchey's ramblings are intolerable. In fact, they are childish and immature. Paul Kendrick has asked sincere and reasonable questions about the integrity of the 2008 election process. If there is, indeed, election fraud by VOTF officials, then those who participated must be held accountable and responsible for their actions.
I would have some respect Mr. Bouchey if he responded to the issues at hand. Perhaps, Mr Bouchey's time would be better spent if he called upon VOTF national leadership to issue a statement in response to the allegations of election fraud.
Marie Tupper



Author: george bouchey
Comment:
Droll, to Droller! First claim there is a RUMOUR


Author: george bouchey
Comment:

Droll to Droller! First claim there is a rumor? of election fraud. Then assign the rumored? fraud to a particular group. Then demand the group explain the rumor?, which may or may not have existed at all. Is there something termed circular illogic?

By the way, there are those, who if I had their respect, I would be suspicious I had done something wrong.

Last day to vote, and this madness ends. How have you been holding up under the suspense? Will the "maries" PK become a member? Will the SSWG take over and reduce our task by eliminating two Goals? Will PK run for the NCR? For President?! Stay tuned!!!



Author: Bob Schwiderski, National Representative
Comment:

I am simply amased this type of grap is being injected into the thought of this organization !

George Bouchey, the member with no affiliate, is to me, an injector of doom and gloom. Only an organizational wart keep injecting this crap: "Will the SSWG take over and reduce our task by eliminating two Goals? George Bouchy "

With feelings you have personal tendencies which lean heavily on the ego maniac side of life -- I mentioned over a week ago that his posts would return - just so he could pat himself on his back when he put his nite cap on -- george got the last word.

Have at it george -- feed more cancer all afternoon and this evening. VOTF needs more from the member without an affiliate - why, because none wants him.


Author: george bouchey
Comment:
:-)

------

February 23 questions to some fishy on the newly elected presidnet Dan Bartley, Janet Hauter's team

Author: Paul Kendrick
Comment:
Someone in the national leadership of Voice of the Faithful is "leaking" the "real time" vote count to the Dan Bartley campaign.

"I have been told by a member of the national leadership that as of Sunday the votes for the two Presidential candidates are VERY close. There is much at stake and EVERY VOTE COUNTS."
Joan Bedosky, Long Island VOTF 2/19/2008

Who in "national leadership" is "leaking" the real time vote count?

"In my role as 'LIVOTF Membership Communications', I have a policy of neutrality on all communications I send to our general membership on behalf of the Board of Directors. That is the way I see my responsibility.

"Now I want to step out of that role and personally ask you to "Get out the votes" for Dan Bartley as the new President of Voice of the Faithful. I urge you to do so because this election is so critical to the future of VOTF."
Joan Bedosky, LI VOTF



Author: Mary Farmer
Comment:
In reply to post re: supposed "leak," perhaps there is no "leak," just readily available info. Or perhaps it came from the same person who gave the VOTF membership info to the SSWG candidates to send out unsolicited campaign e-mails. I am a member of VOTF and, had this question been posed by another VOTF member, perhaps it would merit a reply but it was not and it does not, as far as I am concerned.
BTW, I wonder how that non-member got a copy of Joan B's communique to members? Hmmm...just another attempt to disrupt and undermine. Let's just let the election process play out and pray we remain Christ-centered and 3 goal oriented.


Author: Paul Kendrick
Comment:
Dear Ms. Farmer,

My question still stands, your ad hominum comments withstanding.

It is interesting to note that instead of responding to the question I posed, you are attempting to disparage the VOTF member who forwarded the email to others when he or she determined that something is very much amiss in the voting process.

It is now documented that Dan Bartley and Kevin Connors have had access to up to the minute voting results and other candidates have not.

I am sure you will agree that the secret information they have received provides them with an unfair edge in the election.

The question I have asked is reasonable.

Who is the person(s) who is leaking the vote tallies?

This malfeasance is further proof that the Archdiocese of Voice of the Faithful is alive and well. There is a hierarchy, there is secrecy, there is a lack of openness and transparency. Lay clericalism is rampant.

Paul Kendrick
Co-founder, VOTF Maine


------

The newly elected officers of VOTF
(secret members of Opus Dei)

PRESIDENT Dan Bartley

VICE-PRESIDENT
Janet Hauter

TREASURER
Kevin Connors

SECRETARY
Julie McConville

------

These candidates were endorsed by Fr. Tom Doyle
(of course they didn't win)

Kristine Ward - President

David Biersmith -- Vice-President

-------

Paris Arrows' comment on Kevin Connor campaign. He was elected Treasurer!

Note that this candidate does not mention one iota about supporting victims of clergy abuse. This candidate is a footsoldier for Opus Dei blueprint for VOTF --- it's all about "the Church into the 21st century" and "The right of woman to equal treatment in the Church and Elimination of mandatory clerical celibacy..blah blah blah...barking on petrified forest 2,000 year old dogmas and doctrines
The Opus Dei just want VOTF to keep barking -- lots of empty words...nothing of substance....nothing for SNAP... and nothing for victims of church abuse.

The Opus Dei want total rule and autocracy through the pope and dogmas and doctrines. There is no freedom of speech and the VOTF will become nothing but a barking dog tied on Octopus Dei leash!

Kevin Connor's campaign for Treasurer

It's Your Decision. But Here's Why You Should Vote For Me

To serve effectively as your Treasurer and Chief Financial Officer, a candidate must bring with him or her proven experience, knowledge, and technical skills. I have all of these essential skill sets, and I urge you to vote for me as your next Treasurer.

Along with an MBA Degree and experience as an management lecturer in residence at a southern university, I have been a businessman and consultant for 40 years. During the past 5 years, I served as Treasurer and Finance Committee co-chair of VOTF's largest affiliate. I've had the good fortune to experience first hand in my VOTF positions virtually all of the issues that face your Treasurer. And with our strong management team on Long Island, which includes your candidate for president Dan Bartley, I have been successful time and time again. Remember your Treasurer is not a cheerleader. He or she is responsible for building, nurturing and managing the financial resources that are necessary for VOTF to carry out its mission and achieve its goals.

Beyond finances, I've played an active planning role with Long Island VOTF. I am particularly interested in reaching out beyond our membership to the broader faith community, including organizations of like mind, to form consensus and pursue our goals. I believe VOTF can and should lead the charge for developing consensus on the following:

How to bring the Church into the 21st century

Financial reporting and transparency

Establishing an elected, Representative Diocesan Finance Council in every Diocese in the nation

The right of woman to equal treatment in the Church

Elimination of mandatory clerical celibacy; and tenure, vesting and guaranteed pensions for priests

Legislation to protect the rights of the abused


I would appreciate receiving your vote for Treasurer


Paris Arrow Says:

February 12th, 2008 at 9:14 pm

You are barking at a 2,000 year old dogma on "mandatory clerical celibacy"…remember the boy who cried wolf! wolf! wolf!


--------------------

Author: jo williams
Comment:
I am interested in knowing from the candidates for president what leadership you have taken to advance the extension/repeal of the statute of limitations for victims of child abuse in your state and within your chapter. I will not vote for anyone who thinks the problem is solved, fixed, or in any way lessened by the passage of time or the passage of such legislation in some states.

------
Author: Paul Kendrick
Comment:
Integrity of Election Procedures

To: VOTF 2008 National Elections Committee:
Margaret Roylance, Massachusetts, Chair, Anne Wilson, New York, Ginny Hoehne, Ohio, Vince Grenough, Kentucky, Joe Juhasz, Colorado, Robert Rowden, California

Re: Election Procedures

The VOTF election committee has employed www.Campus-Vote.com to administer the current election of VOTF officers (www.campus-vote.com).

Campus-vote.com offers web-based voting and surveys for professional organizations and faculty/student governments.

Here’s my question: does any person (or persons) other than representatives of www.Campus-Vote.com have access to “real time” election voting results? In other words, does any member of the VOTF election committee, VOTF’s current officers and trustees, VOTF’s Executive Director, or anyone other than official representatives of www.Campus-Vote.com have access to current, updated (real time), election results?

It is interesting to note that Campus-Vote.com addresses the issue of potential conflict of interest on their web site.

“Many of our clients prefer our experienced staff (we've run hundreds of elections) to act as an independent third party to administer their election and make sure that everything goes smoothly…(otherwise) you may have…to deal with potential controversies over the procedures and results.”

Here’s the scary part (from Campus-Vote web site) “As election administrator, you can also view the current vote counts. http://www.campus-vote.com/webware74/wwwexam/display-votes.html”

So, the question is: Who is the “election administrator? Who has access to the up to the minute (real time) vote tally?

Lay clericalism is rampant in VOTF, especially among the current slate of officers and trustees. Can you imagine a scenario in which the “Election Administrator” keeps certain candidates informed of the ongoing vote count? There are those who might think they are doing what’s best for VOTF by helping certain candidates get elected.

-------Questions asked (unanswered) to elected Jim Jenkins

Author: Paul Kendrick
Comment:
To: Mr. Joseph Juhasz

Last week, I posted a question on this site for Mr. Joseph Juhasz (see copy below).

Mr. Juhasz is a member of the VOTF National Representative Council and most recently served as moderator of the three candidate dabates.

In my own diocese, it is typical for the bishop and his spokesperson not to respond to questions that are either damaging to them or are so uncomfortable that, in their minds, they have only two options. They can either lie or not respond at all.

Mostly, they choose not to respond.

Unfortunately (sadly?), Mr. Juhasz has, like a bishop, chosen not to respond to my question.

Incidents like this affirm my thesis that VOTF has become the church it is trying to change.

It is documented that VOTF has a hierarchy, it is engaged in secrecy, it lacks openness and transparency. It has become, with the help of VOTF members like Joseph Juhasz, the Archdiocese of Voice of the Faithful.

If this were not so, VOTF leaders such as Mr. Juhasz would not hesitate to respond to any and all questions.

Ad Majorem Dei Gloriam.

Sincerely,
Paul Kendrick
Co-Founder, VOTF Maine
__________________________

COPY

February 8th, 2008 at 11:34 am

Dear Mr. Juhasz,

I have been watching the candidate debates with great interest. I applaud your efforts to keep things moving so that as many questions as possible are asked of the candidates.

I hope you have a moment to respond to a question.

You may not have realized it, but before the last debate began, a conversation between Margaret Roylance (it sounded like her) and you could be heard via the audio transmission. Margaret was going through the list of questions for the candidates that were submitted by viewers of the telecast (and audio portion).

Margaret was overheard to say, “we can ignore questions from those people.”

In your capacity as moderator, Mr.Juhasz, did you censor certain questions based on
the identity of the person (or persons) who submitted the question?

Thank you for your time.
Author: jjenkins
Comment:
Since he specifically mentioned my name (posting #164), I think I should comment on Board of Trustee member Dan Sullivan’s statement about my request for financial information.

Quite frankly, I am astonished that I am the only candidate, standing for election as VOICEotf Treasurer, who has made inquiries regarding the current financial status of the organization.

As a candidate for Treasurer, I have received numerous inquiries from members about VOICEotf’s current financial status (and what I am going to do about it!).

Rather than engage in wanton speculation, I prefer to base any statements I would make on good solid, current information. VOICEotf would be ill served with anything less.

Actually, all candidates should have been provided with solid, current, accurate financial data so that we could responsibly represent VOICEotf to the membership and the public.

Am I “satisfied” with the response, as Dan Sullivan suggests? Yes and no. Not really.

The requested information (regarding income/expenses/cash on hand) that has been made available to me is dated, and not really current. (As a member of the NRC, I did received summary reports at our October 2007 which were predated then and not reflective of activity since and including the Providence convocation.)

Of course, the proverbial “elephant under the rug” is that whomever the newly elected officers may be, whatever initiatives they will want to espouse, their ability to deliver to the membership will be severely constrained by the current financial status of VOICEotf for the foreseeable future.

I am committed to TRANSPARENCY and ACCOUNTABILITY to VOICEotf membership regarding our all of our financial affairs. We need to MODEL how we expect the church to act with accountability and transparency.

I am committed to spearheading renewed and reenergized FUNDRAISING EFFORTS to support and underwrite our advocacy agenda for a new church in a new century.

Beyond this, I want to “BUILD the VOICE,” build with the membership a strong partnership, commitment and responsibility for our collective resources.

Each VOICEotf member needs to be educated to prophetic STEWARDSHIP of our mission and goals.

I ask for your vote. BUILD the VOICE!

Jim Jenkins
Candidate for VOICEotf Treasurer

Author: Lisa Braglia
Comment:
This question is for Mr. Jenkins and all the other candidates who have access to the latest financial information:

It would seem from Jim Jenkins' response that the financial information he received is more recent than that posted on the VOTF website. Would anyone who has access to this updated information be willing to share it with the membership, and would anyone be willing to tell us why this updated information hasn't been posted to the VOTF website so that the membership might have access to it?

Thank you.

Author: Marie Tupper
Comment:
Two recent posts regarding financial accountability from VOTF trustees is alarming. I am particularly interested in knowing why Keven Connors, candidate for treasurer, has not asked for a current, up to date financial statement.

I am equally concerned that Dan Bartley, candidate for president, is in possession of this information (because he is a trustee) and is unwilling to release the aforementioned financial statement.

Let's put an end to all this nonsense right now.

Mr. Bartley, take some responsibility here. Insist that an up to date financial statement is made available to all members by 5:00 PM tomorrow.

If you do not do this, Mr. Bartley, then you have painted yourself as a member of the secretive, authoritative VOTF hierarchy.

Mr. Connors, I ask the same of you in your capacity as candiadate for Treasurer of VOTF.

Sincerely,
Marie Tupper
VOTF member



4. The Opus Dei voice of Mother Angelica

The Mole has instinctively told us that she goes to Mother Angelica for advice which proves Angelica's control on VOTF. Our exposition of the hypocrisy of Mother Angelica is here.

Mother Angelica's EWTN is all about the Holy Father and Holy Mass and holy canonizations by the Opus Dei popes. There is NOTHING about the voice of justice of victims of the John Paul II Pedophile Priests Army.

So with Opus Dei controlling EWTN and VOTF, all we can do is watch the Opus Dei power-hunger existence and also watch their own Opus Dei demise because the B16-OD Benedict XVI-Opus Dei Titanic Ship has been hit by a heaven-sent Galileo Iceberg right in the heart of Rome - the La Sapienza University science professors and students rejected and made Benedict XVI cancel his visit and speech on their opening school day last January -- We provided full coverage in our Benedict XVI website.

Benedict XVI-Opus Dei B16-OD Titanic Ship

It isn't the Catholics like us who will bring the Vatican Palace of Opus Dei into rubbles, it is God himself who sees and hears the cries of the 12,000 American children crying into heaven for the sins of the John Paul II Pedophile Priests Army -- whose sins WITHIN the EUCHARIST were covered-up by the Opus Dei and John Paul II and Benedict XVI.

The Opus Dei are like the Pharisees in Jesus' time -- they loved to parade their holiness and judged others as more "lowly" than them like Publicans. God does not sleep and justice will be served. The sin of cover-up of priest-pedophilia that Opus Dei did for more than a quarter of century with John Paul II and Benedict XVI will not go unpunished in this new century. Opus Dei has shown only cruelty -- no mercy -- to Jon Sobrino and Tom Doyle (to name a few) -- the Opus Dei too will have no mercy from heaven. Not even their Opus Dei founder St? Josemaria can salvage the Benedict XVI-Opus Dei B16-OD Titanic Ship from sinking in the heart of Rome......

Listen to Fr. Tom Doyle interviewed in YouTube
explaining how the Pope covered up clergy sexual abuse



Last year after Mahony paid off the $660 million to victims of hundreds of pedophile-priests he covered-up, we wrote this article which is fitting to reprint here because Janet Hauter and her team of newly elected VOTF Opus Dei officers will be official mouthpiece of the Octopus Dei for at least 2 years.












It is quite a coincidence that as we reveal for the first time the role of Opus Dei in the cover-up of the JPIIPPA John Paul II Pedophile Priests Army for more than 26 years these giant squids suddenly appear on the shores of southern California.

God is sending the sign (through these giant predators) to confirm that we are speaking the truth and nothing but the truth about the Octopus Dei who is the ultimate cover-upper of the priest pedophilia of the 20th century and is the modern predator in the Catholic church today.

Shame on the City of Angels as NOT ONE Los Angeles theologian raised his voice to denounce Cardinal Mahony and asked for his resignation. Shame on the City of Angels as representatives of SNAP and Catholics did not protest Cardinal Mahony's hypocrisy and demand him to step down and leave town. Shame on the City of Angels that has lost its sense of decency and justice - for the children who are least of the brethren of Christ who suffered the most heinous crime of priest pedophilia in the Catholic church in the 20th century.

We in Boston did our job well for the victims of the JPIIPPA John Paul II Pedophile Priests Army and we got rid of Cardinal Bernard Law (one of the commanders of the Third Reich of the JPIIPPA). Cardinal Law was not a good American citizen and so we did not want to see him walk in our Bostonian soil. We refused to hear his liar-voice preaching everyday in our diocese and churches . It was not a surprise that John Paul II took him to Rome to join his other cohorts-in-crime, JPII clones Benedict XVI and Opus Dei eunuchs, Masters of Deceit at the Vatican (prime Opus Dei real estate)where they continue to rule amidst pompous ceremonies like the Tsars using their OD cunning tentacles.

Shame on the City of Angels so immune to sex that it clasps the 508 pedophile priests and kowtow to Cardinal Mahony, Master of Cunning and Deceit. The City of Angels breaths easy amidst LA landscape stenched with sex. Perhaps this is not a surprise as Hollywood reels with sex films; and the Catholic church seething with the JPIIPPA John Paul II Pedophile Priests Army blends well into the sex scene.

Video of giant squids off California coast http://cbs11tv.com/pets/local_story_093132302.html
"They feed like a pack of wolves, and what they'll do is they will force their prey to the surface." (Opus Dei preys on anyone who demand justice for the poor and the downtrodden and who dares point out the truth about their secretive OD schemes.)

"And they just get themselves into an absolute feeding frenzy. These things are literally eating machines." (Opus Dei are literally eating machines on anyone who speaks the truth like the Jesuits).

"Giant squid make for good eating (like Opus Dei may look good in Latin Mass and in their piety). They can be broiled, baked, fried or barbecued. And are considered a delicacy. Just know they are also cannibalistic..." (right, cannibalistic like the holy Opus Dei who mauls on their prey the Jesuits - e.g. Jon Sobrino who has given his entire life to serve the poor people of El Salvador was silenced and prohibited to publish and teach -- by the Opus Dei Bishop who wouldn't dare dirty his hands to serve the poor).

See May 7, 2007 of http://pope-ratz.blogspot.com/
for the complete story on Jon Sobrino.

"The squids have been described as looking 'like aliens'" (like Opus Dei holy aliens)

"They get up to about 100 pounds, (and) eight feet long! Eight feet of fighting fury".

Hell knows no fury like the Opus Dei scorned.


(Images: Getty, BBC,AP)
http://mondopulpo.blogspot.com/2005/10/octopus-stencil-octopus-dei.html

John Paul II, VOTF, Diamond Bride Mother Angelica

How many women members of VOTF can afford to wear a one-carat diamond ring or at least a 0.25 carat on their finger…while Mother Angelica has $50 Million worth of diamonds and jewels within her monastery in Alabama? And how many women of VOTF or women in America can afford the time to pray and chant and speak like Mother Angelica? Most of all, how many of the $3 Billion settlement victims of the John Paul II Pedophile Priests Army, more than 12,000 American boys and girls, can afford and have one minute of safety in Mother Angelica’s secure $250 Million fenced monastery? (And these were the prices of more than 10 and 20 years ago.)

In the movie Blood Diamond starring Leonardo DiCaprio, based on a true story, the introduction states:

Sierra Leonne, 1999.

Civil war rages for control of the diamond fields.
Thousands have died and millions have become refugees.
None of whom has ever seen a diamond.


In the same year, on December 19, 1999, another television event in America was happening in Alabama at the EWTN Eternal Word Television Network when its founder Mother Angelica inaugurated the Temple of the Eucharist" that holds her diamonds at her monastery...... and her intention was to “overwhelm everybody” – according to her official biography. Mother Angelica's Temple of the Eucharist surpasses the Taj Mahal and imitates the jewels of the Temple of Solomon...and is encrusted with the Blood Diamonds from Sierra Leonne.

Leonardo's character in the movie says : "God has left this place long time ago". And he is so right because Jesus apparently is now living in the Blood Diamond temple of Mother Angelica, his Diamond Bride who houses him - away from Sierra Leone: Mother had ordered that the interior back wall of the tabernacle – home of the monastery’s most precious possession, the Eucharist – be encrusted with diamonds, visible only to the Occupant. Jesus deserved the very best.

EWTN, Alabama, Deceomber 19, 1999

“After spending more than $50 Million and expending countless hours approving and planning every details of the temple, Mother Angelica, like millions around the word, watched its consecration on television.

The Consecration of the Shrine of the Most Blessed Sacrament had to be moved to December 19, 1999, due to shipping delay of chapel furnishing from Germany and Spain.
For the public, it was a first time glimpse of the Romanesque-Gothic Temple Mother had talked about for years. Her intention to “overwhelm everybody, should they forget the reality that this is God’s presence – God’s House -” was more than fulfilled.

The camera honed in on the twenty-four-karat-gold-leaf reredos rising like a castle from the chapel’s sanctuary. Behind the altar, the tabernacle: a resplendent cathedral of glittering spires and hand-carved gold arresting the eye. Mother had ordered that the interior back wall of the tabernacle – home of the monastery’s most precious possession, the Eucharist – be encrusted with diamonds, visible only to the Occupant. Jesus deserved the very best. As she viewed the image of her labors on the big screen, Angelica’s mind must have wandered back with satisfaction to her promise made in 1956 to “build God’s monastery in the south.” (Page 292)(Bold emphasis added)

Jesus deserved the very best...from the John Paul II Pedophile Priests Army? GET REAL, Mother Angelica! What planet are you living on?

A nun is a Bride of Christ but Mother Angelica is a "Diamond Bride" because of all the diamonds she possesses in Alabama...a sharp contrast to the Mother of Christ who couldn't afford a diamond ring in Nazareth!

In the movie, protesters carried banners that said: "Diamonds equal death"

Therefore, Mother Angelica has death spattered on the walls of her Temple of the Eucharist.

The movie also cites:
"In Janaury 2003, forty nations signed "The Kiberly Process" -- an effort to stem the flow of conflict diamonds.

But ilegal diamonds are still finding their way to market. It is up to the consumer to insist that a diamond is conflict-free."

So, Mother Angelica, are your diamonds "conflict-free" or are they "Diamonds equal death"?

The song of the movie sings:
Everybody want Heaven but nobody wants death.
Everybody wants diamonds without the bloddshed.
Shine on, Shine on, Shine on...

Mother Angelica nd EWTN, shine one, shine on......

----------

Biography Mother Angelica: The Remarkable Story of a Nun, Her Nerve, and a Network of Miracles, (Doubleday 2005)

Author Raymond Arroyo is about as much of an insider of EWTN and one Mother Angelica's associates as you can get. He is the news director and a lead anchor at EWTN who has been close to Angelica for years. Most interesting in the book is his discussion of her early life in poverty with a highly dependent mother who simply couldn’t get by without her daughter, Rita Rizzo. This created a dysfunctional relationship that would affect both of them for the rest of their lives. Against all the odds, however, she managed to create a massive television network that reaches millions of people all around the world...the EWTN Eternal Word Television Network.

-----------

In the official website of the Shrine of the Most Blessed Sacrament, it says: The Church, all throughout Her existence has spared no expense, neither has She been silent in showing forth her joyful gratitude and profound amazement for so sublime a Gift as the Holy Eucharist. Following this example, our own Mother Angelica has become an instrument in bearing testimony to this reality.(Bold emphasis added)

Indeed, she can afford to spare no expenses because the Church is the wealthiest institution on earth!

----------

EWTN is one of the main (secret) media networks of the Opus Dei that carried LIVE the canonization of their St? Josemaria Escriba in October 2002. An Opus Dei priest regularly preaches and writes for EWTN. Every year EWTN advertise the global and national celebration of Masses with complete list of presiding Bishops and Cardinals held in honor of St? Josemaria in June (which we posted last June 2007)

Mother Angelica is the biggest clue of the Opus Dei Mole in VOTF. The Vice-President candidate who ran to her received this advice:

I consulted with Mother Angelica on this and she said that moles can only be identified by people who have their heads in the dirt. She also said “It’s naughty to slander and the accuser needs to do penance!” Janet Hauter

Interpretation: Mother Angelica says that Paris Arrow can only identify moles because she has dirt in her head...and that she is naughty to slander and needs to do penance!

I've got news for you Mother Angelica, YOU are not qualified to be a member of the VOTF because you are under the payroll of Opus Dei and you are a puppet of the papacy that wants to shut down VOTF. You live in a unreal world so different from us laity and the VOTF. VOTF voice is not the same as yours…and must not be similar to yours. You are a typical preacher of "PRAY, pay, OBEY" and "ASK NO QUESTION". You would be a disastrous adviser to VOTF because you are as VAIN as Benedict XVI who puts on make-up everyday for the television and cameras and dress up pompously to meet world leaders and celebrities. The ONLY advice you will tell us is "Go to confession and do penance" (like you told Janet Hauter about me). You think that confession would have solved the sins of the John Paul II Pedophile Priests Army crying out to Heaven? Your diamonds-studded Temple of the Eucharist is inutile for the sins of the John Paul II Pedophile Priests Army and your diamonds are like the jewels of the Temple of Solomon... someday your temple too will crumble with not one stone standing up.

While we are so busy focusing on the assets of Bishops and dioceses, we miss to see that the millionaire palace of Bishops pales in comparison with the eccentricity and ostentatiousness of the Temple of Mother Angelica - who is the loudest voice for the Pope and the church in America. It is amazing how the most religious and famous “holy people” like Mother Angelica and Benedict XVI use the name of God in vain… all in the name of the poor Christ whose Mother Mary couldn’t afford a 0.01 carat diamond ring. GET REAL, MOTHER ANGELICA!

Watch the movie "Blood Diamond" starring Leonardo di Caprio.

----------

The mansion of Bishop Richard Malone pales in comparison with the Temple of Mother Angelica

Ignatius Group


We are asking Bishop Richard J. Malone to answer two reasonable questions:

1) Does it make sense for you to use church funds to pay the expense for one person (you) to live in a 7,000 sq. ft., 16 room, $1.2 million mansion?

2) How does your decision to use $1.2 million of parishioners' resources for this purpose affect, involve or enable the poor?

Bishop Malone won't respond. In fact, he won't disclose any of the costs of operating and maintaining such a large building. While most Maine families are pinching and scraping to pay the high costs of home heating oil this winter season, Bishop Malone lives comfortably in a 7,000 sq.ft. home, paid for by the way, by Maine's Catholic community.

Annual Fiscal Report


During the next few weeks, Bishop Malone will release the diocese's 2007 annual financial report for the period ending June 30, 2007.

At this same time last year, David Twomey, Diocesan Finance Director, issued a subtle warning. "Both parish offertory and the Bishop's Appeal have increased but not at a pace to cover the inflationary increases in expenses. Fortunately, we have been able to hold the rate of growth in operating expense at about 1.8%. Unfortunately, this has caused some ministries to be constrained or reduced. The challenge we face as we move to a cluster structure is to make best use of our current resources…"

Which begs the question? Does Bishop Malone really want us to believe that "the best use of our current resources" is for the bishop to live by himself in a 7,000 sq.ft. residence?

It's ironic. On the one hand Bishop Malone wants Maine's Catholics to dig deeper and deeper into their pockets to help support the Bishop's Appeal, yet, on the other hand, Bishop Malone refuses to move out of his grandiose mansion to less costly and more appropriate living quarters.

Elderly, Retired Priests Evicted

It is interesting to note that, several months ago, Bishop Malone did not hesitate to "evict" several elderly, retired priests from their living quarters at the Cathedral when it became more cost efficient to lease the same space to Catholic Charities (administrative offices).


The Poor are the Church, Bishop Malone.

Sell the mansion.


Paul Kendrick

Ignatius group

207 838 1319

P.S. We have a New Year's wish for Bishop Malone. We'd like the bishop to invite all Maine Catholics to follow the bishop's lead by taking the following action during Lent 2008: all meetings held under Church auspices, at the parish or diocesan level, no matter what their purpose, must begin with the agenda item: How shall what we are doing here affect or involve the poor?

-------------


Bishop’s Mansion at 199 Western Promenade, Portland (3 car garage not shown)

The Bishop's Mansion
Bishop Richard Malone lives by himself in a three-story, 7,000 sq. ft. brick mansion in Portland's most expensive neighborhood. His stately residence has sixteen rooms, including six bedrooms, four bathrooms and a three-car garage. The bishop refuses to tell parishioners the annual costs of heating, operating and maintaining his luxurious home.

The bishop's property has been assessed by the City of Portland at an approximate value of $1.2 million. Property taxes amount to more than $18,000 per year. It is estimated that the expense of heating, operating and maintaining the mansion costs an additional $22,000 per year.

Bishop Malone refuses to relocate to a more cost efficient and affordable residence, even though there is an abundance of comfortable living and entertainment space available in any one of the nearby parish rectories.

John Paul II muting VOTF Voice of the Faithful

This letter (below) of chairman Bill Casey distancing VOTF Board of Trustees from Fr. Tom Doyle marks a very sad day in America and our constitution that guarantees freedom of speech. The worst part about Opus Dei is that there is no freedom of speech and it demands absolute obedience to the Pope, John Paul II and to St? Josemaria Escriva......or we "go to Hell"! The VOTF is infiltrated by Opus Dei footsoldiers, MOLES and spies...I have been right all along in saying this bold statement and this letter of the Board of Trustees of VOTF ousting Fr. Tom Doyle proves my allegations right. Therefore, with Fr. Richard McBrien, Janet Hauter and now Bill Casey and VOTF Board of Trustees, Octopus Dei's tentacles have finally engulfed the heads and throats of the Board of Trustees. That is a typical Opus Dei strategy -- conquer the head and you've conquered the entire body. So Opus Dei have conquered the VOTF through its Board of Trustees.

This is a sad day for Americans who have looked up to the VOTF for legitimate reforms in the church...but when one door closes another opens and "All roads lead to Rome" indeed... because as VOTF shuts its voice in America...in Rome La Sapienza University science faculty and students just shut off the voice of Benedict XVI hence opening the voice of "WISDOM" of us the Laity -- yes, La Sapienza by protesting the Pope and his Opus Dei written speech and visit at their school opening day last January, the Pope cancelled his visit...and now he trembles, yes the Pope and Opus Dei trembles before GISU...read full La Sapienza protest coverage here.

In 1982 Fr. Tom Doyle was fired from his job as Chaplain of the US Navy for whistleblowing the priest pedophilia reality and because John Paul II and the church didn't want to hear about it. Today, 26 years later, over a quarter of a century later the Opus Dei and Benedict XVI also don't want to hear about this any longer especially after the church has already paid more than $3Billion to the victims. Opus Dei want the VOTF to be "a meek and mild voice " - speaking only about issues that are unalterable and impertinent to lives and safety of children, such as the ordination of women, which are really outside-the-vein and "harmless" to the institutional church. Opus Dei want to bury the priest-pedophilia John Paul left behind so they can canonize JPII saint as soon as possible. With a Saint? John Paul II together with St? Josemaria Escriba, Opus Dei plan to make them both as the WORD OF GOD...and through them they plan to achieve WORLD DOMINATION and rule the church of the 21st century in a fantasy land of live happily every after amidst Zeffirelli movie production at the Vatican Television daily.

Fr. Tom Doyle in the last paragraph of his letter to VOTF said:
Is there any hope at all? Yes! The hope is not in the institution or in bureaucratic policies, programs or empty pronouncements.

Alas VOTF Bill Casey and Board of Trustees have opted to join the institution.

Alas VOTF has been muted on its throat engulfed by the Octopus Dei tentacles.

Alas for America -- there is no hope in VOTF !

We need to be bold like the La Sapienza University science professors and students who protested and successfully made Benedict XVI cancel his visit and speech on their opening school day last January.

It is ironic that the American VOTF Voice of the Faithful has now been muted by John Paul II from his grave through the Octopus Dei ...but meanwhile in the heart of Rome the B16-OD Benedict XVI-Opus Dei Titanic Ship has been hit by the Galileo Iceberg.


========


Thanks to Voice from the Desert with just and fitting comments by Frank Douglas in italics.

February 2, 2008

Yesterday I found in my email inbox the latest issue of In the Vineyard, the Voice of the Faithful's (VOTF) email-based electronic newsletter regularly mailed to all registered VOTF members.

I was shocked and dismayed when I read the letter from Bill Casey, Chair of VOTF's Board of Trustees to Tom Doyle, a long-time friend of VOTF's. Casey's letter responds to Tom Doyle's essay on VOTF and the Reform of the Governmental Structure of the Catholic Church...

Casey, writing on behalf of the Board, distances himself and the Board from one of VOTF's best friends and a true modern prophet.

============


VOTF Board of Trustees Distances Itself from Tom Doyle

Letter of Chair of the Board, Bill Casey

January 29, 2008
Rev. Thomas P. Doyle, J.C.D., C.A.D.C.
9700 Woodland Glen Court
Vienna, VA 22182

Dear Tom,

I am writing on behalf of VOTF’s Board of Trustees, most of whom you personally know. You also know that we all hold you in high regard and are forever grateful for your leadership on sexual abuse, your support for survivors, and your help to VOTF as we have struggled to respond to the ongoing crisis in our church.

The trustees, all volunteers, met last weekend and of course we discussed your recent critical statements about VOTF. We agree that VOTF can do better, but we do disagree on some important points.

Voice of the Faithful has been a movement of women and men who believe that the Catholic Church is more than a mere human institution. Our church has certainly never been perfect and it has always needed reform. We Vatican II Catholics have learned that anew as we witnessed the continuing failures of the institutional church.

It has been our conviction that we should do our best to reform the church by affirming our shared responsibility for its life and work here and now, most especially in response to the corruption revealed in the sex abuse crisis. We continue to believe that we should work to strengthen the voice of the laity in the governance and guidance of the church and claim the laity’s rightful place in decisions being made every day. Our members and our leaders do not believe that the church will be best served by giving up on Vatican II reforms. Your suggestion that such efforts are a distraction from the pressing work of reform is a judgment with which we respectfully, but profoundly, disagree.

We fear that your call to abandon efforts to influence church decision-making amounts to a surrender of the church, its parishes, and its ministries to the evils of clericalism and hierarchical power.

Tom Doyle’s prophetic words and acts of compassion to clergy sex abuse survivors have motivated thousands of VOTF members. To twist Tom Doyle’s words and to use emotion-laden words like these demonstrate an inability to hear a friend’s plea for a major mid-course correction in VOTF’s present trajectory.

We have had similar disagreements with friends in other Catholic reform organizations, and within our own membership. We, respectfully, yet profoundly, reject the proposal to turn away from the existing structure [this misrepresents what Tom has written], or to confine our work to the one goal of advocacy for survivors of abuse, important as that advocacy has been, and will continue to be, to VOTF’s mission. From the start, we have argued that we serve the interests of survivors by keeping the faith [faith in whom? The corrupt institution? The enabling bishops? Or the gospel message of compassion and justice?] and trying as best we can to change the church.

Survivor support was the foundational motivation of VOTF, but it was always connected with support for priests of integrity and working for structural reform. The three goals existed together from the outset of VOTF. They are three children of the same Catholic parents. Call us foolish, if you will, but we will not choose among them!

We believe that the Catholic Church, its institutions, and ministries, built over generations by our American Catholic forebears [and controlled by an unaccountable clerical culture enabled by a compliant laity], are worth fighting for, even if its ordained leaders [to call the bishops leaders is inaccurate; the next time you write, Bill, I suggest that you use the term church officials] resist our efforts. The desire to achieve justice for survivors of sexual abuse also opened our eyes to the underlying evils of clericalism. The root problem is the clerical nature of the institution [and the attendant fear, denial, and silence that grips the laity], and restriction of power to the ordained [the power of the ordained is enabled by the learned powerlessness, and silence, and timidity of the laity]. This condition was not always true, nor is it likely to last into eternity. We can shape a different future [how do we do this, Bill?], but only if we make the effort to do so with intelligence, imagination and perseverance. Good people differ over how best to carry out our call to change the church, and we need to remain in conversation [conversation is fine, but action speaks louder than words] as we work as best we can to build a movement for genuine reform.

In a recent Commonweal article, VOTF Board members Bill Casey and David O’Brien wrote, “The bishops are deeply attached to a closed system of governance, which they claim is required to ensure the unity and orthodoxy of the church. Even on financial matters, personnel, and pastoral planning, most bishops continue to insist on total control, an attitude that has no persuasive theological justification.”

In response, Robert Blair Kaiser wrote on this blog, “If VOTF’s leaders know how to correct this situation, they seem reluctant to say so.”

After 6 years of existence, what has VOTF accomplished in the area of structural reform? There has been lots of talk, but no plan and no action. It’s obvious that we need a new approach and new leaders.

Call us naive, Tom. We have been called worse. Call us misguided, if you will, but we must endure on the course that seems right to us.

It may seem right to the Board of Trustees, but what do VOTF’s members say?

The laity’s time will come one day, and ours will be a better church when that day arrives.

The laity’s time is now. Now is the time for action. Our ship has come in. It’s at the dock. All we have do is climb aboard and take control.

Until then, our resolute choice is to continue the journey on the path we have chosen since our founding and is guided by our mission statement: To provide a prayerful voice, attentive to the Spirit, through which the Faithful can actively participate in the governance and guidance of the Catholic Church.

It’s time for a more realistic, more action-oriented mission statement.

We hope and pray that even if we can only agree to disagree over our reform efforts, you will continue to regard us as friends, seek with us opportunities for dialogue and collaboration, and keep us in your prayers. We intend to do the same for you.

Per our earlier conversation, I look forward to an opportunity shortly to meet with you to discuss your views in more detail and share ours with you. Given that many VOTF members have read and commented on your recent statements about VOTF and its future, we also intend to circulate this response within our membership.

Sincerely,

Bill Casey, Chair of the Board of Trustees

Trustees
Dan Bartley
Ron DuBois
Mary Pat Fox
John Hushon
Elia Marnik
David O’Brien
Jayne O’Donnell
Jim Post
Dan Sullivan

------------------------

The verb "muting" was chosen because it is most appropriate to what John Paul II, Benedict XVI and Octopus Dei have done to VOTF.

muting

Removal of the capacity of an animal to make a loud call. In the dog this is done by removal of a small part of each vocal cord.

VOTF's capacity to make a loud call has been removed...by Octopus Dei's removal of each of the Board of Trustees' vocal cord.

----------------------

My prophetic VOTF posts: John Paul II squashes VOTF Voice of the Faithhful through Fr. Richard McBrien. Written after the VOTF national convention in October 22, 2007.

John Paul II clone Cardinal George and The Mole in VOTF -- I was called preposterous, libel and slander, "person with dirt in the head and go to confession and do penance" by Mother Angelica, adviser of The Mole in VOTF.

Well, thanks to Mother Angelica's despotic Octopus Dei recipe -- with Fr. Tom Doyle, I am in Good Company!

And Mille Grazie to La Sapienza University in Rome for PROVING ME RIGHT and PROVING MY WEBLOGS RIGHT!

DEO GRATIAS!
---------------

Listen to Fr. Tom Doyle interviewed in YouTube
explaining how the Pope covered up clergy sexual abuse



"Sex Crimes and Vatican" - Epicenter in Boston in USA



"Sex Crimes and the Vatican"