John Paul II Octopus Dei swallows VOTF...and make it VOOD Voice of Opus Dei in America
Breaking News: Opus Dei trembles before Fr. Tom Doyle and Benedict XVI trembles before GISU! The Benedict XVI-Opus Dei B16-OD Titanic Ship has been hit by the Galileo Iceberg!
Fr. Tom Doyle is "THE Conscience of Our Age"
Opus Dei trembles before Fr. Tom Doyle because he is the star witness against the canonization of John Paul II, the poster boy of Opus Dei and mystical husband of St? Josemaria Escriva. As long as Fr. Tom Doyle is alive and well, Opus Dei tremble and cannot sleep at night -- they know that they cannot canonize and say "John Paul II did not know about his more than 5,500 American pedophile-priests sexually abusing more than 12,000 American boys and girls". Fr. Tom Doyle is THE living "Conscience of Our Age"...it isn't Benedict XVI who claims to be that conscience as we exposed in our Benedict XVI weblog "Benedict XVI the FAULTY Conscience of our age".
So Opus Dei is glad it has swallowed the VOTF and will make it the American version of VOOD Voice of Opus Dei among the laity who are not "official" members of Opus Dei. But it will be run by secret Opus Dei members such as in the newly elected team (see list below) of The Mole Janet Hauter, Vice-President.
Proofs of Opus Dei strategic conquest of VOTF to expand their WORLD DOMINATION agenda
It is not a surprise that The Mole of Opus Dei whom we have pointed out has won - with her team - the VOTF National Elections. These are the 4 biggest proofs that the Octopus Dei has strategically (and successfully) swallowed the VOTF Voice of The Faithful. We will post more in days and months to come as these Opus Dei footsoldiers will show their true colors and their "American-Domination agenda" on behalf of Opus Dei - as elected VOTF officers.
1. Fr. Richard McBrien at VOTF National Convention
Last October 2006 at the VOTF convention, Fr. Richard McBrien was the main VOTF speaker and he equates the (alive) Opus Dei priest Fr. McCloskey as equal to Bishop Fulton Sheen. This was our coverage which shook the daylight out of the faithful. Opus Dei's media spins are so subtle like snakes...they thought no one would spot McBrien's Opus Dei tricks....but we exposed them in clear daylight.
Bishop Fulton Sheen whom the Opus Dei are helping to be beatified in the Vatican Opus Dei saint-factory.
Opus Dei priest McCloskey of the Catholic Information Center in Washington DC. He controls prominent American Opus Dei members through their weekly (or more often) confessions, Opus Dei members such as Supreme Court judges Scalia, Clemens, Roberts, billionaires like Tom Monighan, etc.
2. The outgoing VOTF Chair, Bill Casey, and Board of Trustees "distance VOTF from Fr. Tom Doyle" on the eve of VOTF National Elections. This final act of Bill Casey and Boad Members prove that they are secret Opus Dei members obeying orders from Opus Dei. Opus Dei wanted to show America that Fr. Tom Doyle has been cut off from VOTF - for good- and did not want to take any chances with the election of a new team of officers at VOTF. But the balloting is questionable as was raised by Paul Kenricks - (see number 3 below of 'questions to candidates' that were left unanswered)...the election of 2008-VOTF oficers are as questionable as the canonization of Opus Dei founder St? Josemaria Escriva! See the pattern of Octopus Dei lies?
Last January 8, 2008 Fr. Tom Doyle wrote a letter to the VOTF to help them in their upcoming National Elections.
In reply to Tom Doyle's letter to VOTF, on the eve of the VOTF National Elections, Bill Casey, the Chair and the Board of Trustees of the VOTF wrote a public letter "to distance VOTF from Fr. Tom Doyle". This was the biggest omen of the Opus Dei's TOTAL control on the VOTF. Therefore, all the candidates that Tom Doyle supported in public were discredited along with him and the Opus Dei candidates were elected.
The St. John the Baptist Voice of Fr. Tom Doyle
The mighty King Herod trembled at the voice and message of the imprisoned and poor St. John the Baptist. Likewise, the mighty Octopus Dei trembles at the message and voice of Fr. Tom Doyle, the star witness of the John Paul II mortal sin because he was the main leader in the cover-up of the 26 years John Paul II Pedophile Priests Army.
Let us always remember:
Victims - Attackers - Responsible Leaders
Pearl Harbor - 3,000 victims - 170 planes - Admiral Yamamoto
WTC & 9/11 attacks - 5,000 victims - 19 Muslims - Osama bin Laden
USA Priest Pedophilia - 12,000 victims - 5,448 priests - John Paul II + Benedict XVI + St? Josemaria de Opus Dei (the new Roman Catholic Trinity!)
Fr. Tom Doyle makes the Opus Dei tremble because he is the star witness to John Paul II's mortal sin that cannot make JP2 a "saint". With the Devil's Advocate abolished by John Paul II -- he abolished it to expedite the canonization of St? Josemaria Escriva at his Vatican saint-factory -- Fr. Tom Doyle is the main prophet, the 20th century St. John the Baptist who originally and has continuously informed John Paul II that his Pedophile Priests Army would cost the Church more than a billion dollars. Tom Doyle's prophecy came true and it has cost the American Church 3 Billion dollars up to today and still counting. This does not include the other poor countries who don't have American lawyers like we do who can afford to work for victims at their own millions of dollars expense.
So today, we can safely say that the John Paul II Voice of Octopus Dei has swallowed the VOTF, and all we can expect is some fairy tale VOTF chanting Latin Mass and "pretending" to fight for women -priest ordination that will NEVER be heard in Rome or seen in this century. The Octopus Dei has swallowed VOTF and all that VOTF will do is "pretend" to be the voice of the faithful, but to be more precise, to be the VOOD Voice of Opus Dei.
Octopus Dei may have won over the VOTF but Opus Dei will always tremble before Tom Doyle -- who is the ONLY conscience left standing to defy the canonization of John Paul II. The Opus Dei founder St? Josemaria with the Hitler-genius captured the Vatican, the Vatican Bank, and the Conference of Bishops and Cardinals worldwide. That is the snake's strategy: Capture the Head and you've captured the whole body. The Opus Dei are in all judiciary systems, Scalia, Clemens, Roberts,in USA Supreme Court. In England, they've converted Tony Blair into becoming a Catholic. The Opus Dei WORLD DOMINATION AGENDA seems to be succeeding, but as long as Tom Doyle's voice is heard, they cannot canonize John Paul II who is guilty in the crime-of-cover-up of more than 10,000 American children victims of his John Paul II Pedophile Priests Army.
The strategy of Opus Dei is to silence Fr. Tom Doyle by removing ALL organizations that recognize him, especially VOTF Voice of the Faithful. The next organization Opus Dei want to convince to "distance itself from Tom Doyle" is SNAP. Opus Dei is slowly but surely trying to get BishopsAccountability and Abuse Tracker to delete its files. Watch out for a "sudden" blackout and "accidental deletion" of files in the world wide web! We are saving all our posts in bloggers in case it is infiltrated by some Opus Dei technicians who will "accidentally delete" our weblogs!
Opus Dei want Tom Doyle's head in a silver platter and VOTF has delivered that to them. Luckily, in today's Google Age, Tom Doyle's voice will continue to resound in The John Paul II Millstone and his books and websites.
3. The Opus Dei Mole in VOTF
Last January 21, 2008, we pointed out The Mole in VOTF, Janet Hauter, candidate for Vice-President. To our shock, her son George Bouchey has the most bitter voice among all those who posted questions to candidates (see his posts below). Our questions were left on the VOTF site but they were all deleted 2 days before the final voting last February 22. We re post them here to show what Janet Hauter and George Bouchey refused to answer. Opus Dei control their members in secrecy within the confessional and their members obey blindly.
With the team of Janet Hauter having won, we now know that VOTF electors are mostly Opus Dei members. No one in their right mind would vote for Janet Hauter who cannot answer our "pure questions" that strike to the heart of VOTF -- the defense of the victims of priest-pedophilia. Our questions are reposted below.
Questions asked to "The Mole" Janet Hauter
Author: Janet Hauter
#93—Marie Tupper Says:
Dear Ms. Hauter,
A certain blogspot (http://jp2m.blogspot.com/2008/01/john-paul-ii-clone-cardinal-george-and.html) is accusing you of being a member of Opus Dei.
Are you a member of Opus Dei, or in any way associated with Opus Dei?
Marie, I find this bizarre/preposterous question a clone of the private correspondence exchange I had with Paul Kendrick recently. Because I believe in total transparency and have no fear of his “Johnny one note” rants, I offer them to you exactly as was discussed.
(Edited out repeat of OD-Mole clues above. Bold emphasis added))
I consulted with Mother Angelica on this and she said that moles can only be identified by people who have their heads in the dirt. She also said “It’s naughty to slander and the accuser needs to do penance!” Janet Hauter
Paul Kendrick writes: Please stop being silly. Just answer the simple question. Are you a member of, or in any way associated with Opus Dei?
Secondly, the Ignatius Group message was distributed only to you and your son, George Bouchey. I wanted to first determine what your reaction would be. However, if you do not respond to the question about whether or not you are an Opus Dei member (or in any way associated with Opus Dei ; i.e., is your spouse a member?), then I will publish the link to the blog and your refusal to answer the question.
Janet Hauter’s post:
SLANDER/LIBEL
A type of defamation. Slander is an untruthful oral (spoken) statement about a person that harms the person’s reputation. Because slander is a tort (a civil wrong), the injured person can bring a lawsuit against the person who made the false statement. If the statement is made via broadcast media — for example, over the radio or on TV — it is considered libel, rather than slander, because the statement has the potential to reach a very wide audience.
Subject: Why are you so upset about a simple question? You need to take a deep breath.
Date: 1/26/2008 3:41:56 P.M. Central Standard Time
From: IgnatiusGroup
Reply To:
To: JMWHauter
Janet Hauter’s post: The question is ludicrous. I am not now, never have been, have no relatives that are or would ever consider membership in Opus Dei. Bizarre question.
Do whatever you need to do. This conversation is closed. J
-
Paris Arrows questions to Janet Hauter
Paris Says:
February 7th, 2008 at 8:22 am
Paris Arrow, author of The Mole in VOTF and Mother Angelica & VOTF in http://www.jp2m.blogspot.com question to Janet Hauter:
1) In your #130 reply (to my question #121) you said: “I make no judgements about correspondence from other organizations. I addressed only VOTF issues which I better know than other organizations” — shows you are a recluse candidate (driven by only one hidden OD agenda) — which I would add as The-Mole-in-VOTF-clue-number-9 to my list http://jp2m.blogspot.com/2008/01/john-paul-ii-clone-cardinal-george-and.html .
Aren’t you aware that SNAP and VOTF recently TOGETHER wrote a letter http://pope-ratz.blogspot.com/2008/01/snap-demands-cardinal-laws-resignation.html to Pope Benedict XVI demanding that Cardinal Bernard Law resign before the pope’s visit to USA this coming April ? You said that “demanding Cardinal George to resign is hollow, empty and meaningless” therefore, do you likewise find this unified letter of SNAP and VOTF to the pope hollow, empty and meaningless?
130
jhauter Says:
February 6th, 2008 at 9:42 pm
#121: Paris Says:
Personally, to me, statements (asking for Cardinal George’s resignation or making a statement about women) is hollow, empty and meaningless. It’s action that I support but action that is based on hard data!
1) What exactly are the hard data you are waiting for — hasn’t Bishops Accountability provided enough ‘hard data’?
I can only respond locally. After a year of research using SNAP data and BA data compared and contrasted to Archdiocesan data, we found the Archdiocese reported slightly over 60% of the predator priests we uncovered. We are still doing research but we also found that some parishes (and zip codes) had multiple sequential and (in some cases) simultaneous predators assigned either to the same parish or in proximity. We will assess trends when data collection is complete.
I make no judgments about correspondence from other organizations. I addressed only VOTF issues which I know better than other organizations.
Janet Hauter, Candidate for Vice President
127
jhauter Says:
February 6th, 2008 at 4:59 pm
If you haven’t garnered already I am an action oriented individual. Calling for Cardinal George’s resignation will achieve nothing but a small obscure place in the media. The Cardinal will only dig his heels in further to reinforce the clerical culture. I’ve met with him, I’ve talked to him on the phone. Chicago solutions were tailored to the issues and facts presented. The story is not over. There was never any negotiation with Cardinal George and that myth has been beaten to death–it is simply a misunderstanding of what happened in our two hour meeting with him. It began with a contentious tone on his part and ended with him inviting us back.
140
Paris Says:
February 8th, 2008 at 11:45 pm
Question to George Bouchey in #138 (February 8th, 2008 at 10:23 pm)
So, George Bouchey, you are the son of Janet Hauter and by your tone you are one hell of a campaigner… but did you know that you are clue #10 in The Mole in VOTF because of the way you signed your name with “pax” ? Pax is the Latin Opus Dei standard greetings among members.
Cited the word “PAX” in your post #46
george bouchey Says:
January 19th, 2008 at 8:56 pm
Welcome, Marie without a full name. Hmm, I sense underneath your sleazy slander an “old friend” who has supplied us with similar posts. Is Marie your real name?
Are you a VotF member? Or is it just an alias used for harrassing nice, honest people who aren’t afraid to identify themselves? Is there an honest question in your two post? Perhaps you would try again and be at least a little honest. Give us a reason to pay attention to you!
pax - george bouchey
Cited that you are the “son of candidate Janet Hauter” in her own #96 Janet Hauter Says: (quoting Paul within her reply)
January 27th, 2008 at 12:18 pm
Paul Kendrick writes: Please stop being silly. Just answer the simple question. Are you a member of, or in any way associated with Opus Dei?
Secondly, the Ignatius Group message was distributed only to you and your son, George Bouchey. I wanted to first determine what your reaction would be. However, if you do not respond to the question about whether or not you are an Opus Dei member (or in any way associated with Opus Dei ; i.e., is your spouse a member?), then I will publish the link to the blog and your refusal to answer the question.
Janet Hauter’s reply:
SLANDER/LIBEL …
The question is ludicrous…
(Bold emphasis added)
—------
Well, George Bouchey, perhaps you can help your mother Janet Hauter answer this very important and more relevant question and pertinent matter (than your endless bickering against Paul Kendrick and others):
#131 February 7th, 2008 at 8:22 am
Paris Arrow, author of The Mole in VOTF and Mother Angelica & VOTF in http://www.jp2m.blogspot.com question to Janet Hauter:
1) In your #130 reply (to my question #121) you said: “I make no judgements about correspondence from other organizations. I addressed only VOTF issues which I better know than other organizations” — shows you are a recluse candidate (driven by only one hidden OD agenda) — which I would add as The-Mole-in-VOTF-clue-number-9 to my list http://jp2m.blogspot.com/2008/01/john-paul-ii-clone-cardinal-george-and.html .
Aren’t you aware that SNAP and VOTF recently TOGETHER wrote a letter http://pope-ratz.blogspot.com/2008/01/snap-demands-cardinal-laws-resignation.html to Pope Benedict XVI demanding that Cardinal Bernard Law resign before the pope’s visit to USA this coming April ? You said that “demanding Cardinal George to resign is hollow, empty and meaningless” therefore, do you likewise find this unified letter of SNAP and VOTF to the pope hollow, empty and meaningless?
February 19. 2008
Questions for Candidates
Use the form below to submit a question for any and all candidates.
184
Paris Says:
February 18th, 2008 at 11:26 am
Hey Janet Hauter, you - your team mates candidates -footsoldiers of Opus Dei and their Opus Dei blueprint for VOTF — and your son George Bouchey owe VOTF the answer to this FUNDAMENTAL question:
Question from 12 DAYS AGO
#131 February 7th, 2008 at 8:22 am
Paris Arrow, author of The Mole in VOTF and Mother Angelica & VOTF in http://www.jp2m.blogspot.com question to Janet Hauter:
In your #130 reply (to my question #121) you said: “I make no judgements about correspondence from other organizations. I addressed only VOTF issues which I better know than other organizations” — shows you are a recluse candidate (driven by only one hidden OD agenda) — which I would add as The-Mole-in-VOTF-clue-number-9 to my list http://jp2m.blogspot.com/2008/01/john-paul-ii-clone-cardinal-george-and.html .
Aren’t you aware that SNAP and VOTF recently TOGETHER wrote a letter http://pope-ratz.blogspot.com/2008/01/snap-demands-cardinal-laws-resignation.html to Pope Benedict XVI demanding that Cardinal Bernard Law resign before the pope’s visit to USA this coming April ? You said that “demanding Cardinal George to resign is hollow, empty and meaningless” therefore, do you likewise find this unified letter of SNAP and VOTF to the pope hollow, empty and meaningless?
Janet Hauter, is your secret agenda to make VOTF the laity’s VOOP Voice of Opus Dei? And are you - and your team mates - going to always run to Mother Angelica for advice and pray at her Blood Diamond chapel ?
How many women members of VOTF can afford to wear a one-carat diamond ring or at least a 0.25 carat on their finger…while Mother Angelica has $50 Million worth of diamonds and jewels within her monastery in Alabama? complete article in http://jp2m.blogspot.com/2008/02/john-paul-ii-diamond-bride-mother.html
Paris Says:
February 11th, 2008 at 9:26 pm
Your comment is awaiting moderation.
Janet Hauter, you and your son George Bouchey owe VOTF the answer to this FUNDAMENTAL question:
#131 February 7th, 2008 at 8:22 am
Paris Arrow, author of The Mole in VOTF and Mother Angelica & VOTF in http://www.jp2m.blogspot.com question to Janet Hauter:
1) In your #130 reply (to my question #121) you said: "I make no judgements about correspondence from other organizations. I addressed only VOTF issues which I better know than other organizations" — shows you are a recluse candidate (driven by only one hidden OD agenda) — which I would add as The-Mole-in-VOTF-clue-number-9 to my list http://jp2m.blogspot.com/2008/01/john-paul-ii-clone-cardinal-george-and.html .
Aren't you aware that SNAP and VOTF recently TOGETHER wrote a letter http://pope-ratz.blogspot.com/2008/01/snap-demands-cardinal-laws-resignation.html to Pope Benedict XVI demanding that Cardinal Bernard Law resign before the pope's visit to USA this coming April ? You said that "demanding Cardinal George to resign is hollow, empty and meaningless" therefore, do you likewise find this unified letter of SNAP and VOTF to the pope hollow, empty and meaningless?
——
CHECKMATE– to Janet Hauter and team …and son George Bouchey -who has the most bitter voice and foul language in VOTF!
VOTF should be ashamed for having George Bouchey as a member and monopolizing in unChristian manner VOTF forums such as this)
Janet Hauter, why don't you simply withdraw your candidacy and spare the "muting" of VOTF by Benedict XVI & Opus Dei http://www.jp2m.blogspot.com/
Paris Says:
February 13th, 2008 at 7:26 am
Your comment is awaiting moderation.
Hey Janet Hauter, you - your team mates candidates -footsoldiers of Opus Dei and their Opus Dei blueprint for VOTF — and your son George Bouchey owe VOTF the answer to this FUNDAMENTAL question:
Question from A WEEK AGO
#131 February 7th, 2008 at 8:22 am
Paris Arrow, author of The Mole in VOTF and Mother Angelica & VOTF in http://www.jp2m.blogspot.com question to Janet Hauter:
1) In your #130 reply (to my question #121) you said: "I make no judgements about correspondence from other organizations. I addressed only VOTF issues which I better know than other organizations" — shows you are a recluse candidate (driven by only one hidden OD agenda) — which I would add as The-Mole-in-VOTF-clue-number-9 to my list http://jp2m.blogspot.com/2008/01/john-paul-ii-clone-cardinal-george-and.html .
Aren't you aware that SNAP and VOTF recently TOGETHER wrote a letter http://pope-ratz.blogspot.com/2008/01/snap-demands-cardinal-laws-resignation.html to Pope Benedict XVI demanding that Cardinal Bernard Law resign before the pope's visit to USA this coming April ? You said that "demanding Cardinal George to resign is hollow, empty and meaningless" therefore, do you likewise find this unified letter of SNAP and VOTF to the pope hollow, empty and meaningless?
Janet Hauter and team mates, why don't you simply withdraw your candidacy and spare the "muting" of VOTF by Benedict XVI & Opus Dei http://www.jp2m.blogspot.com/
How can VOTF "Keep the Faith and Change the Church" when - through you - it is the Voice of Opus Dei and its petrified forest 2,000 year old dogmas and doctrines?
----
george bouchey Says:
February 11th, 2008 at 9:10 pm
Tom et al,
Perhaps the principle to consider is related to the story about whether it is better to give people fish, and feed them for a day, or teach them to fish, and feed them for a lifetime.
I submit we have to do both without so concentrating on one that all others fall by the wayside. Consider honestly whether or not VotF can ever supply the support to victims/survivors that an organization like SNAP can. And there are other organizations with similar missions. Only supporting victims/survivors is akin to feeding the faithful for a day. Yes, it must be done. No, it is not enough in itself. Attempting to change the institution that victimized them is just as worthy a goal, and it must be attempted to eliminate as near as possible to none the future abuse of children. We may not see substantial results immediately, but like a long journey, it starts with a single step. When you look at the existing reform orgs, VotF is the one with a unique and balanced program.
If you want a balanced program, it is neceasary to have a balanced administration and membership. "There's no free lunch, you get what you pay for, and nothin's gonna come in the mail"
georgebouchey@comcast.net
-------
The son of Janet Hauter campaigning on the last day of VOTF election of National Officers: George Bouchey's February 24's posts. George wanted to have the last word and he got it. We posted how George is a major sign of The Mole in VOTF
Author: george bouchey
Comment:
How drol is the last comment from PK! Even amusing!! At last it is disclosed that the knowledge of "ad hominem'' is known to the leader of the select group breathing the rareified and negative charged air of the NE.
It's hard to be a "wannabe". So difficult to be beyond the fringe of membership in the once scorned organizatiion to which one can only re-aspire as one who once was, is not and never will be!
Many are called, few are chosen, even fewer re-chosen. C'est le vie! Au revoir!!
Author: Marie Tupper
Comment:
George Bouchey's ramblings are intolerable. In fact, they are childish and immature. Paul Kendrick has asked sincere and reasonable questions about the integrity of the 2008 election process. If there is, indeed, election fraud by VOTF officials, then those who participated must be held accountable and responsible for their actions.
I would have some respect Mr. Bouchey if he responded to the issues at hand. Perhaps, Mr Bouchey's time would be better spent if he called upon VOTF national leadership to issue a statement in response to the allegations of election fraud.
Marie Tupper
Author: george bouchey
Comment:
Droll, to Droller! First claim there is a RUMOUR
Author: george bouchey
Comment:
Droll to Droller! First claim there is a rumor? of election fraud. Then assign the rumored? fraud to a particular group. Then demand the group explain the rumor?, which may or may not have existed at all. Is there something termed circular illogic?
By the way, there are those, who if I had their respect, I would be suspicious I had done something wrong.
Last day to vote, and this madness ends. How have you been holding up under the suspense? Will the "maries" PK become a member? Will the SSWG take over and reduce our task by eliminating two Goals? Will PK run for the NCR? For President?! Stay tuned!!!
Author: Bob Schwiderski, National Representative
Comment:
I am simply amased this type of grap is being injected into the thought of this organization !
George Bouchey, the member with no affiliate, is to me, an injector of doom and gloom. Only an organizational wart keep injecting this crap: "Will the SSWG take over and reduce our task by eliminating two Goals? George Bouchy "
With feelings you have personal tendencies which lean heavily on the ego maniac side of life -- I mentioned over a week ago that his posts would return - just so he could pat himself on his back when he put his nite cap on -- george got the last word.
Have at it george -- feed more cancer all afternoon and this evening. VOTF needs more from the member without an affiliate - why, because none wants him.
Author: george bouchey
Comment:
:-)
------
February 23 questions to some fishy on the newly elected presidnet Dan Bartley, Janet Hauter's team
Author: Paul Kendrick
Comment:
Someone in the national leadership of Voice of the Faithful is "leaking" the "real time" vote count to the Dan Bartley campaign.
"I have been told by a member of the national leadership that as of Sunday the votes for the two Presidential candidates are VERY close. There is much at stake and EVERY VOTE COUNTS."
Joan Bedosky, Long Island VOTF 2/19/2008
Who in "national leadership" is "leaking" the real time vote count?
"In my role as 'LIVOTF Membership Communications', I have a policy of neutrality on all communications I send to our general membership on behalf of the Board of Directors. That is the way I see my responsibility.
"Now I want to step out of that role and personally ask you to "Get out the votes" for Dan Bartley as the new President of Voice of the Faithful. I urge you to do so because this election is so critical to the future of VOTF."
Joan Bedosky, LI VOTF
Author: Mary Farmer
Comment:
In reply to post re: supposed "leak," perhaps there is no "leak," just readily available info. Or perhaps it came from the same person who gave the VOTF membership info to the SSWG candidates to send out unsolicited campaign e-mails. I am a member of VOTF and, had this question been posed by another VOTF member, perhaps it would merit a reply but it was not and it does not, as far as I am concerned.
BTW, I wonder how that non-member got a copy of Joan B's communique to members? Hmmm...just another attempt to disrupt and undermine. Let's just let the election process play out and pray we remain Christ-centered and 3 goal oriented.
Author: Paul Kendrick
Comment:
Dear Ms. Farmer,
My question still stands, your ad hominum comments withstanding.
It is interesting to note that instead of responding to the question I posed, you are attempting to disparage the VOTF member who forwarded the email to others when he or she determined that something is very much amiss in the voting process.
It is now documented that Dan Bartley and Kevin Connors have had access to up to the minute voting results and other candidates have not.
I am sure you will agree that the secret information they have received provides them with an unfair edge in the election.
The question I have asked is reasonable.
Who is the person(s) who is leaking the vote tallies?
This malfeasance is further proof that the Archdiocese of Voice of the Faithful is alive and well. There is a hierarchy, there is secrecy, there is a lack of openness and transparency. Lay clericalism is rampant.
Paul Kendrick
Co-founder, VOTF Maine
------
The newly elected officers of VOTF
(secret members of Opus Dei)
PRESIDENT Dan Bartley
VICE-PRESIDENT
Janet Hauter
TREASURER
Kevin Connors
SECRETARY
Julie McConville
------
These candidates were endorsed by Fr. Tom Doyle
(of course they didn't win)
Kristine Ward - President
David Biersmith -- Vice-President
-------
Paris Arrows' comment on Kevin Connor campaign. He was elected Treasurer!
Note that this candidate does not mention one iota about supporting victims of clergy abuse. This candidate is a footsoldier for Opus Dei blueprint for VOTF --- it's all about "the Church into the 21st century" and "The right of woman to equal treatment in the Church and Elimination of mandatory clerical celibacy..blah blah blah...barking on petrified forest 2,000 year old dogmas and doctrines
The Opus Dei just want VOTF to keep barking -- lots of empty words...nothing of substance....nothing for SNAP... and nothing for victims of church abuse.
The Opus Dei want total rule and autocracy through the pope and dogmas and doctrines. There is no freedom of speech and the VOTF will become nothing but a barking dog tied on Octopus Dei leash!
Kevin Connor's campaign for Treasurer
It's Your Decision. But Here's Why You Should Vote For Me
To serve effectively as your Treasurer and Chief Financial Officer, a candidate must bring with him or her proven experience, knowledge, and technical skills. I have all of these essential skill sets, and I urge you to vote for me as your next Treasurer.
Along with an MBA Degree and experience as an management lecturer in residence at a southern university, I have been a businessman and consultant for 40 years. During the past 5 years, I served as Treasurer and Finance Committee co-chair of VOTF's largest affiliate. I've had the good fortune to experience first hand in my VOTF positions virtually all of the issues that face your Treasurer. And with our strong management team on Long Island, which includes your candidate for president Dan Bartley, I have been successful time and time again. Remember your Treasurer is not a cheerleader. He or she is responsible for building, nurturing and managing the financial resources that are necessary for VOTF to carry out its mission and achieve its goals.
Beyond finances, I've played an active planning role with Long Island VOTF. I am particularly interested in reaching out beyond our membership to the broader faith community, including organizations of like mind, to form consensus and pursue our goals. I believe VOTF can and should lead the charge for developing consensus on the following:
How to bring the Church into the 21st century
Financial reporting and transparency
Establishing an elected, Representative Diocesan Finance Council in every Diocese in the nation
The right of woman to equal treatment in the Church
Elimination of mandatory clerical celibacy; and tenure, vesting and guaranteed pensions for priests
Legislation to protect the rights of the abused
I would appreciate receiving your vote for Treasurer
Paris Arrow Says:
February 12th, 2008 at 9:14 pm
You are barking at a 2,000 year old dogma on "mandatory clerical celibacy"…remember the boy who cried wolf! wolf! wolf!
--------------------
Author: jo williams
Comment:
I am interested in knowing from the candidates for president what leadership you have taken to advance the extension/repeal of the statute of limitations for victims of child abuse in your state and within your chapter. I will not vote for anyone who thinks the problem is solved, fixed, or in any way lessened by the passage of time or the passage of such legislation in some states.
------
Author: Paul Kendrick
Comment:
Integrity of Election Procedures
To: VOTF 2008 National Elections Committee:
Margaret Roylance, Massachusetts, Chair, Anne Wilson, New York, Ginny Hoehne, Ohio, Vince Grenough, Kentucky, Joe Juhasz, Colorado, Robert Rowden, California
Re: Election Procedures
The VOTF election committee has employed www.Campus-Vote.com to administer the current election of VOTF officers (www.campus-vote.com).
Campus-vote.com offers web-based voting and surveys for professional organizations and faculty/student governments.
Here’s my question: does any person (or persons) other than representatives of www.Campus-Vote.com have access to “real time” election voting results? In other words, does any member of the VOTF election committee, VOTF’s current officers and trustees, VOTF’s Executive Director, or anyone other than official representatives of www.Campus-Vote.com have access to current, updated (real time), election results?
It is interesting to note that Campus-Vote.com addresses the issue of potential conflict of interest on their web site.
“Many of our clients prefer our experienced staff (we've run hundreds of elections) to act as an independent third party to administer their election and make sure that everything goes smoothly…(otherwise) you may have…to deal with potential controversies over the procedures and results.”
Here’s the scary part (from Campus-Vote web site) “As election administrator, you can also view the current vote counts. http://www.campus-vote.com/webware74/wwwexam/display-votes.html”
So, the question is: Who is the “election administrator? Who has access to the up to the minute (real time) vote tally?
Lay clericalism is rampant in VOTF, especially among the current slate of officers and trustees. Can you imagine a scenario in which the “Election Administrator” keeps certain candidates informed of the ongoing vote count? There are those who might think they are doing what’s best for VOTF by helping certain candidates get elected.
-------Questions asked (unanswered) to elected Jim Jenkins
Author: Paul Kendrick
Comment:
To: Mr. Joseph Juhasz
Last week, I posted a question on this site for Mr. Joseph Juhasz (see copy below).
Mr. Juhasz is a member of the VOTF National Representative Council and most recently served as moderator of the three candidate dabates.
In my own diocese, it is typical for the bishop and his spokesperson not to respond to questions that are either damaging to them or are so uncomfortable that, in their minds, they have only two options. They can either lie or not respond at all.
Mostly, they choose not to respond.
Unfortunately (sadly?), Mr. Juhasz has, like a bishop, chosen not to respond to my question.
Incidents like this affirm my thesis that VOTF has become the church it is trying to change.
It is documented that VOTF has a hierarchy, it is engaged in secrecy, it lacks openness and transparency. It has become, with the help of VOTF members like Joseph Juhasz, the Archdiocese of Voice of the Faithful.
If this were not so, VOTF leaders such as Mr. Juhasz would not hesitate to respond to any and all questions.
Ad Majorem Dei Gloriam.
Sincerely,
Paul Kendrick
Co-Founder, VOTF Maine
__________________________
COPY
February 8th, 2008 at 11:34 am
Dear Mr. Juhasz,
I have been watching the candidate debates with great interest. I applaud your efforts to keep things moving so that as many questions as possible are asked of the candidates.
I hope you have a moment to respond to a question.
You may not have realized it, but before the last debate began, a conversation between Margaret Roylance (it sounded like her) and you could be heard via the audio transmission. Margaret was going through the list of questions for the candidates that were submitted by viewers of the telecast (and audio portion).
Margaret was overheard to say, “we can ignore questions from those people.”
In your capacity as moderator, Mr.Juhasz, did you censor certain questions based on
the identity of the person (or persons) who submitted the question?
Thank you for your time.
Author: jjenkins
Comment:
Since he specifically mentioned my name (posting #164), I think I should comment on Board of Trustee member Dan Sullivan’s statement about my request for financial information.
Quite frankly, I am astonished that I am the only candidate, standing for election as VOICEotf Treasurer, who has made inquiries regarding the current financial status of the organization.
As a candidate for Treasurer, I have received numerous inquiries from members about VOICEotf’s current financial status (and what I am going to do about it!).
Rather than engage in wanton speculation, I prefer to base any statements I would make on good solid, current information. VOICEotf would be ill served with anything less.
Actually, all candidates should have been provided with solid, current, accurate financial data so that we could responsibly represent VOICEotf to the membership and the public.
Am I “satisfied” with the response, as Dan Sullivan suggests? Yes and no. Not really.
The requested information (regarding income/expenses/cash on hand) that has been made available to me is dated, and not really current. (As a member of the NRC, I did received summary reports at our October 2007 which were predated then and not reflective of activity since and including the Providence convocation.)
Of course, the proverbial “elephant under the rug” is that whomever the newly elected officers may be, whatever initiatives they will want to espouse, their ability to deliver to the membership will be severely constrained by the current financial status of VOICEotf for the foreseeable future.
I am committed to TRANSPARENCY and ACCOUNTABILITY to VOICEotf membership regarding our all of our financial affairs. We need to MODEL how we expect the church to act with accountability and transparency.
I am committed to spearheading renewed and reenergized FUNDRAISING EFFORTS to support and underwrite our advocacy agenda for a new church in a new century.
Beyond this, I want to “BUILD the VOICE,” build with the membership a strong partnership, commitment and responsibility for our collective resources.
Each VOICEotf member needs to be educated to prophetic STEWARDSHIP of our mission and goals.
I ask for your vote. BUILD the VOICE!
Jim Jenkins
Candidate for VOICEotf Treasurer
Author: Lisa Braglia
Comment:
This question is for Mr. Jenkins and all the other candidates who have access to the latest financial information:
It would seem from Jim Jenkins' response that the financial information he received is more recent than that posted on the VOTF website. Would anyone who has access to this updated information be willing to share it with the membership, and would anyone be willing to tell us why this updated information hasn't been posted to the VOTF website so that the membership might have access to it?
Thank you.
Author: Marie Tupper
Comment:
Two recent posts regarding financial accountability from VOTF trustees is alarming. I am particularly interested in knowing why Keven Connors, candidate for treasurer, has not asked for a current, up to date financial statement.
I am equally concerned that Dan Bartley, candidate for president, is in possession of this information (because he is a trustee) and is unwilling to release the aforementioned financial statement.
Let's put an end to all this nonsense right now.
Mr. Bartley, take some responsibility here. Insist that an up to date financial statement is made available to all members by 5:00 PM tomorrow.
If you do not do this, Mr. Bartley, then you have painted yourself as a member of the secretive, authoritative VOTF hierarchy.
Mr. Connors, I ask the same of you in your capacity as candiadate for Treasurer of VOTF.
Sincerely,
Marie Tupper
VOTF member
4. The Opus Dei voice of Mother Angelica
The Mole has instinctively told us that she goes to Mother Angelica for advice which proves Angelica's control on VOTF. Our exposition of the hypocrisy of Mother Angelica is here.
Mother Angelica's EWTN is all about the Holy Father and Holy Mass and holy canonizations by the Opus Dei popes. There is NOTHING about the voice of justice of victims of the John Paul II Pedophile Priests Army.
So with Opus Dei controlling EWTN and VOTF, all we can do is watch the Opus Dei power-hunger existence and also watch their own Opus Dei demise because the B16-OD Benedict XVI-Opus Dei Titanic Ship has been hit by a heaven-sent Galileo Iceberg right in the heart of Rome - the La Sapienza University science professors and students rejected and made Benedict XVI cancel his visit and speech on their opening school day last January -- We provided full coverage in our Benedict XVI website.
Benedict XVI-Opus Dei B16-OD Titanic Ship
It isn't the Catholics like us who will bring the Vatican Palace of Opus Dei into rubbles, it is God himself who sees and hears the cries of the 12,000 American children crying into heaven for the sins of the John Paul II Pedophile Priests Army -- whose sins WITHIN the EUCHARIST were covered-up by the Opus Dei and John Paul II and Benedict XVI.
The Opus Dei are like the Pharisees in Jesus' time -- they loved to parade their holiness and judged others as more "lowly" than them like Publicans. God does not sleep and justice will be served. The sin of cover-up of priest-pedophilia that Opus Dei did for more than a quarter of century with John Paul II and Benedict XVI will not go unpunished in this new century. Opus Dei has shown only cruelty -- no mercy -- to Jon Sobrino and Tom Doyle (to name a few) -- the Opus Dei too will have no mercy from heaven. Not even their Opus Dei founder St? Josemaria can salvage the Benedict XVI-Opus Dei B16-OD Titanic Ship from sinking in the heart of Rome......
Listen to Fr. Tom Doyle interviewed in YouTube
explaining how the Pope covered up clergy sexual abuse
Last year after Mahony paid off the $660 million to victims of hundreds of pedophile-priests he covered-up, we wrote this article which is fitting to reprint here because Janet Hauter and her team of newly elected VOTF Opus Dei officers will be official mouthpiece of the Octopus Dei for at least 2 years.
It is quite a coincidence that as we reveal for the first time the role of Opus Dei in the cover-up of the JPIIPPA John Paul II Pedophile Priests Army for more than 26 years these giant squids suddenly appear on the shores of southern California.
God is sending the sign (through these giant predators) to confirm that we are speaking the truth and nothing but the truth about the Octopus Dei who is the ultimate cover-upper of the priest pedophilia of the 20th century and is the modern predator in the Catholic church today.
Shame on the City of Angels as NOT ONE Los Angeles theologian raised his voice to denounce Cardinal Mahony and asked for his resignation. Shame on the City of Angels as representatives of SNAP and Catholics did not protest Cardinal Mahony's hypocrisy and demand him to step down and leave town. Shame on the City of Angels that has lost its sense of decency and justice - for the children who are least of the brethren of Christ who suffered the most heinous crime of priest pedophilia in the Catholic church in the 20th century.
We in Boston did our job well for the victims of the JPIIPPA John Paul II Pedophile Priests Army and we got rid of Cardinal Bernard Law (one of the commanders of the Third Reich of the JPIIPPA). Cardinal Law was not a good American citizen and so we did not want to see him walk in our Bostonian soil. We refused to hear his liar-voice preaching everyday in our diocese and churches . It was not a surprise that John Paul II took him to Rome to join his other cohorts-in-crime, JPII clones Benedict XVI and Opus Dei eunuchs, Masters of Deceit at the Vatican (prime Opus Dei real estate)where they continue to rule amidst pompous ceremonies like the Tsars using their OD cunning tentacles.
Shame on the City of Angels so immune to sex that it clasps the 508 pedophile priests and kowtow to Cardinal Mahony, Master of Cunning and Deceit. The City of Angels breaths easy amidst LA landscape stenched with sex. Perhaps this is not a surprise as Hollywood reels with sex films; and the Catholic church seething with the JPIIPPA John Paul II Pedophile Priests Army blends well into the sex scene.
Video of giant squids off California coast http://cbs11tv.com/pets/local_story_093132302.html
"They feed like a pack of wolves, and what they'll do is they will force their prey to the surface." (Opus Dei preys on anyone who demand justice for the poor and the downtrodden and who dares point out the truth about their secretive OD schemes.)
"And they just get themselves into an absolute feeding frenzy. These things are literally eating machines." (Opus Dei are literally eating machines on anyone who speaks the truth like the Jesuits).
"Giant squid make for good eating (like Opus Dei may look good in Latin Mass and in their piety). They can be broiled, baked, fried or barbecued. And are considered a delicacy. Just know they are also cannibalistic..." (right, cannibalistic like the holy Opus Dei who mauls on their prey the Jesuits - e.g. Jon Sobrino who has given his entire life to serve the poor people of El Salvador was silenced and prohibited to publish and teach -- by the Opus Dei Bishop who wouldn't dare dirty his hands to serve the poor).
See May 7, 2007 of http://pope-ratz.blogspot.com/
for the complete story on Jon Sobrino.
"The squids have been described as looking 'like aliens'" (like Opus Dei holy aliens)
"They get up to about 100 pounds, (and) eight feet long! Eight feet of fighting fury".
Hell knows no fury like the Opus Dei scorned.
(Images: Getty, BBC,AP)
http://mondopulpo.blogspot.com/2005/10/octopus-stencil-octopus-dei.html
Fr. Tom Doyle is "THE Conscience of Our Age"
Opus Dei trembles before Fr. Tom Doyle because he is the star witness against the canonization of John Paul II, the poster boy of Opus Dei and mystical husband of St? Josemaria Escriva. As long as Fr. Tom Doyle is alive and well, Opus Dei tremble and cannot sleep at night -- they know that they cannot canonize and say "John Paul II did not know about his more than 5,500 American pedophile-priests sexually abusing more than 12,000 American boys and girls". Fr. Tom Doyle is THE living "Conscience of Our Age"...it isn't Benedict XVI who claims to be that conscience as we exposed in our Benedict XVI weblog "Benedict XVI the FAULTY Conscience of our age".
So Opus Dei is glad it has swallowed the VOTF and will make it the American version of VOOD Voice of Opus Dei among the laity who are not "official" members of Opus Dei. But it will be run by secret Opus Dei members such as in the newly elected team (see list below) of The Mole Janet Hauter, Vice-President.
Proofs of Opus Dei strategic conquest of VOTF to expand their WORLD DOMINATION agenda
It is not a surprise that The Mole of Opus Dei whom we have pointed out has won - with her team - the VOTF National Elections. These are the 4 biggest proofs that the Octopus Dei has strategically (and successfully) swallowed the VOTF Voice of The Faithful. We will post more in days and months to come as these Opus Dei footsoldiers will show their true colors and their "American-Domination agenda" on behalf of Opus Dei - as elected VOTF officers.
1. Fr. Richard McBrien at VOTF National Convention
Last October 2006 at the VOTF convention, Fr. Richard McBrien was the main VOTF speaker and he equates the (alive) Opus Dei priest Fr. McCloskey as equal to Bishop Fulton Sheen. This was our coverage which shook the daylight out of the faithful. Opus Dei's media spins are so subtle like snakes...they thought no one would spot McBrien's Opus Dei tricks....but we exposed them in clear daylight.
Bishop Fulton Sheen whom the Opus Dei are helping to be beatified in the Vatican Opus Dei saint-factory.
Opus Dei priest McCloskey of the Catholic Information Center in Washington DC. He controls prominent American Opus Dei members through their weekly (or more often) confessions, Opus Dei members such as Supreme Court judges Scalia, Clemens, Roberts, billionaires like Tom Monighan, etc.2. The outgoing VOTF Chair, Bill Casey, and Board of Trustees "distance VOTF from Fr. Tom Doyle" on the eve of VOTF National Elections. This final act of Bill Casey and Boad Members prove that they are secret Opus Dei members obeying orders from Opus Dei. Opus Dei wanted to show America that Fr. Tom Doyle has been cut off from VOTF - for good- and did not want to take any chances with the election of a new team of officers at VOTF. But the balloting is questionable as was raised by Paul Kenricks - (see number 3 below of 'questions to candidates' that were left unanswered)...the election of 2008-VOTF oficers are as questionable as the canonization of Opus Dei founder St? Josemaria Escriva! See the pattern of Octopus Dei lies?
Last January 8, 2008 Fr. Tom Doyle wrote a letter to the VOTF to help them in their upcoming National Elections.
In reply to Tom Doyle's letter to VOTF, on the eve of the VOTF National Elections, Bill Casey, the Chair and the Board of Trustees of the VOTF wrote a public letter "to distance VOTF from Fr. Tom Doyle". This was the biggest omen of the Opus Dei's TOTAL control on the VOTF. Therefore, all the candidates that Tom Doyle supported in public were discredited along with him and the Opus Dei candidates were elected.
The St. John the Baptist Voice of Fr. Tom Doyle
The mighty King Herod trembled at the voice and message of the imprisoned and poor St. John the Baptist. Likewise, the mighty Octopus Dei trembles at the message and voice of Fr. Tom Doyle, the star witness of the John Paul II mortal sin because he was the main leader in the cover-up of the 26 years John Paul II Pedophile Priests Army.
Let us always remember:
Victims - Attackers - Responsible Leaders
Pearl Harbor - 3,000 victims - 170 planes - Admiral Yamamoto
WTC & 9/11 attacks - 5,000 victims - 19 Muslims - Osama bin Laden
USA Priest Pedophilia - 12,000 victims - 5,448 priests - John Paul II + Benedict XVI + St? Josemaria de Opus Dei (the new Roman Catholic Trinity!)
Fr. Tom Doyle makes the Opus Dei tremble because he is the star witness to John Paul II's mortal sin that cannot make JP2 a "saint". With the Devil's Advocate abolished by John Paul II -- he abolished it to expedite the canonization of St? Josemaria Escriva at his Vatican saint-factory -- Fr. Tom Doyle is the main prophet, the 20th century St. John the Baptist who originally and has continuously informed John Paul II that his Pedophile Priests Army would cost the Church more than a billion dollars. Tom Doyle's prophecy came true and it has cost the American Church 3 Billion dollars up to today and still counting. This does not include the other poor countries who don't have American lawyers like we do who can afford to work for victims at their own millions of dollars expense.
So today, we can safely say that the John Paul II Voice of Octopus Dei has swallowed the VOTF, and all we can expect is some fairy tale VOTF chanting Latin Mass and "pretending" to fight for women -priest ordination that will NEVER be heard in Rome or seen in this century. The Octopus Dei has swallowed VOTF and all that VOTF will do is "pretend" to be the voice of the faithful, but to be more precise, to be the VOOD Voice of Opus Dei.
Octopus Dei may have won over the VOTF but Opus Dei will always tremble before Tom Doyle -- who is the ONLY conscience left standing to defy the canonization of John Paul II. The Opus Dei founder St? Josemaria with the Hitler-genius captured the Vatican, the Vatican Bank, and the Conference of Bishops and Cardinals worldwide. That is the snake's strategy: Capture the Head and you've captured the whole body. The Opus Dei are in all judiciary systems, Scalia, Clemens, Roberts,in USA Supreme Court. In England, they've converted Tony Blair into becoming a Catholic. The Opus Dei WORLD DOMINATION AGENDA seems to be succeeding, but as long as Tom Doyle's voice is heard, they cannot canonize John Paul II who is guilty in the crime-of-cover-up of more than 10,000 American children victims of his John Paul II Pedophile Priests Army.
The strategy of Opus Dei is to silence Fr. Tom Doyle by removing ALL organizations that recognize him, especially VOTF Voice of the Faithful. The next organization Opus Dei want to convince to "distance itself from Tom Doyle" is SNAP. Opus Dei is slowly but surely trying to get BishopsAccountability and Abuse Tracker to delete its files. Watch out for a "sudden" blackout and "accidental deletion" of files in the world wide web! We are saving all our posts in bloggers in case it is infiltrated by some Opus Dei technicians who will "accidentally delete" our weblogs!
Opus Dei want Tom Doyle's head in a silver platter and VOTF has delivered that to them. Luckily, in today's Google Age, Tom Doyle's voice will continue to resound in The John Paul II Millstone and his books and websites.
3. The Opus Dei Mole in VOTF
Last January 21, 2008, we pointed out The Mole in VOTF, Janet Hauter, candidate for Vice-President. To our shock, her son George Bouchey has the most bitter voice among all those who posted questions to candidates (see his posts below). Our questions were left on the VOTF site but they were all deleted 2 days before the final voting last February 22. We re post them here to show what Janet Hauter and George Bouchey refused to answer. Opus Dei control their members in secrecy within the confessional and their members obey blindly.
With the team of Janet Hauter having won, we now know that VOTF electors are mostly Opus Dei members. No one in their right mind would vote for Janet Hauter who cannot answer our "pure questions" that strike to the heart of VOTF -- the defense of the victims of priest-pedophilia. Our questions are reposted below.
Questions asked to "The Mole" Janet Hauter
Author: Janet Hauter
#93—Marie Tupper Says:
Dear Ms. Hauter,
A certain blogspot (http://jp2m.blogspot.com/2008/01/john-paul-ii-clone-cardinal-george-and.html) is accusing you of being a member of Opus Dei.
Are you a member of Opus Dei, or in any way associated with Opus Dei?
Marie, I find this bizarre/preposterous question a clone of the private correspondence exchange I had with Paul Kendrick recently. Because I believe in total transparency and have no fear of his “Johnny one note” rants, I offer them to you exactly as was discussed.
(Edited out repeat of OD-Mole clues above. Bold emphasis added))
I consulted with Mother Angelica on this and she said that moles can only be identified by people who have their heads in the dirt. She also said “It’s naughty to slander and the accuser needs to do penance!” Janet Hauter
Paul Kendrick writes: Please stop being silly. Just answer the simple question. Are you a member of, or in any way associated with Opus Dei?
Secondly, the Ignatius Group message was distributed only to you and your son, George Bouchey. I wanted to first determine what your reaction would be. However, if you do not respond to the question about whether or not you are an Opus Dei member (or in any way associated with Opus Dei ; i.e., is your spouse a member?), then I will publish the link to the blog and your refusal to answer the question.
Janet Hauter’s post:
SLANDER/LIBEL
A type of defamation. Slander is an untruthful oral (spoken) statement about a person that harms the person’s reputation. Because slander is a tort (a civil wrong), the injured person can bring a lawsuit against the person who made the false statement. If the statement is made via broadcast media — for example, over the radio or on TV — it is considered libel, rather than slander, because the statement has the potential to reach a very wide audience.
Subject: Why are you so upset about a simple question? You need to take a deep breath.
Date: 1/26/2008 3:41:56 P.M. Central Standard Time
From: IgnatiusGroup
Reply To:
To: JMWHauter
Janet Hauter’s post: The question is ludicrous. I am not now, never have been, have no relatives that are or would ever consider membership in Opus Dei. Bizarre question.
Do whatever you need to do. This conversation is closed. J
-
Paris Arrows questions to Janet Hauter
Paris Says:
February 7th, 2008 at 8:22 am
Paris Arrow, author of The Mole in VOTF and Mother Angelica & VOTF in http://www.jp2m.blogspot.com question to Janet Hauter:
1) In your #130 reply (to my question #121) you said: “I make no judgements about correspondence from other organizations. I addressed only VOTF issues which I better know than other organizations” — shows you are a recluse candidate (driven by only one hidden OD agenda) — which I would add as The-Mole-in-VOTF-clue-number-9 to my list http://jp2m.blogspot.com/2008/01/john-paul-ii-clone-cardinal-george-and.html .
Aren’t you aware that SNAP and VOTF recently TOGETHER wrote a letter http://pope-ratz.blogspot.com/2008/01/snap-demands-cardinal-laws-resignation.html to Pope Benedict XVI demanding that Cardinal Bernard Law resign before the pope’s visit to USA this coming April ? You said that “demanding Cardinal George to resign is hollow, empty and meaningless” therefore, do you likewise find this unified letter of SNAP and VOTF to the pope hollow, empty and meaningless?
130
jhauter Says:
February 6th, 2008 at 9:42 pm
#121: Paris Says:
Personally, to me, statements (asking for Cardinal George’s resignation or making a statement about women) is hollow, empty and meaningless. It’s action that I support but action that is based on hard data!
1) What exactly are the hard data you are waiting for — hasn’t Bishops Accountability provided enough ‘hard data’?
I can only respond locally. After a year of research using SNAP data and BA data compared and contrasted to Archdiocesan data, we found the Archdiocese reported slightly over 60% of the predator priests we uncovered. We are still doing research but we also found that some parishes (and zip codes) had multiple sequential and (in some cases) simultaneous predators assigned either to the same parish or in proximity. We will assess trends when data collection is complete.
I make no judgments about correspondence from other organizations. I addressed only VOTF issues which I know better than other organizations.
Janet Hauter, Candidate for Vice President
127
jhauter Says:
February 6th, 2008 at 4:59 pm
If you haven’t garnered already I am an action oriented individual. Calling for Cardinal George’s resignation will achieve nothing but a small obscure place in the media. The Cardinal will only dig his heels in further to reinforce the clerical culture. I’ve met with him, I’ve talked to him on the phone. Chicago solutions were tailored to the issues and facts presented. The story is not over. There was never any negotiation with Cardinal George and that myth has been beaten to death–it is simply a misunderstanding of what happened in our two hour meeting with him. It began with a contentious tone on his part and ended with him inviting us back.
140
Paris Says:
February 8th, 2008 at 11:45 pm
Question to George Bouchey in #138 (February 8th, 2008 at 10:23 pm)
So, George Bouchey, you are the son of Janet Hauter and by your tone you are one hell of a campaigner… but did you know that you are clue #10 in The Mole in VOTF because of the way you signed your name with “pax” ? Pax is the Latin Opus Dei standard greetings among members.
Cited the word “PAX” in your post #46
george bouchey Says:
January 19th, 2008 at 8:56 pm
Welcome, Marie without a full name. Hmm, I sense underneath your sleazy slander an “old friend” who has supplied us with similar posts. Is Marie your real name?
Are you a VotF member? Or is it just an alias used for harrassing nice, honest people who aren’t afraid to identify themselves? Is there an honest question in your two post? Perhaps you would try again and be at least a little honest. Give us a reason to pay attention to you!
pax - george bouchey
Cited that you are the “son of candidate Janet Hauter” in her own #96 Janet Hauter Says: (quoting Paul within her reply)
January 27th, 2008 at 12:18 pm
Paul Kendrick writes: Please stop being silly. Just answer the simple question. Are you a member of, or in any way associated with Opus Dei?
Secondly, the Ignatius Group message was distributed only to you and your son, George Bouchey. I wanted to first determine what your reaction would be. However, if you do not respond to the question about whether or not you are an Opus Dei member (or in any way associated with Opus Dei ; i.e., is your spouse a member?), then I will publish the link to the blog and your refusal to answer the question.
Janet Hauter’s reply:
SLANDER/LIBEL …
The question is ludicrous…
(Bold emphasis added)
—------
Well, George Bouchey, perhaps you can help your mother Janet Hauter answer this very important and more relevant question and pertinent matter (than your endless bickering against Paul Kendrick and others):
#131 February 7th, 2008 at 8:22 am
Paris Arrow, author of The Mole in VOTF and Mother Angelica & VOTF in http://www.jp2m.blogspot.com question to Janet Hauter:
1) In your #130 reply (to my question #121) you said: “I make no judgements about correspondence from other organizations. I addressed only VOTF issues which I better know than other organizations” — shows you are a recluse candidate (driven by only one hidden OD agenda) — which I would add as The-Mole-in-VOTF-clue-number-9 to my list http://jp2m.blogspot.com/2008/01/john-paul-ii-clone-cardinal-george-and.html .
Aren’t you aware that SNAP and VOTF recently TOGETHER wrote a letter http://pope-ratz.blogspot.com/2008/01/snap-demands-cardinal-laws-resignation.html to Pope Benedict XVI demanding that Cardinal Bernard Law resign before the pope’s visit to USA this coming April ? You said that “demanding Cardinal George to resign is hollow, empty and meaningless” therefore, do you likewise find this unified letter of SNAP and VOTF to the pope hollow, empty and meaningless?
February 19. 2008
Questions for Candidates
Use the form below to submit a question for any and all candidates.
184
Paris Says:
February 18th, 2008 at 11:26 am
Hey Janet Hauter, you - your team mates candidates -footsoldiers of Opus Dei and their Opus Dei blueprint for VOTF — and your son George Bouchey owe VOTF the answer to this FUNDAMENTAL question:
Question from 12 DAYS AGO
#131 February 7th, 2008 at 8:22 am
Paris Arrow, author of The Mole in VOTF and Mother Angelica & VOTF in http://www.jp2m.blogspot.com question to Janet Hauter:
In your #130 reply (to my question #121) you said: “I make no judgements about correspondence from other organizations. I addressed only VOTF issues which I better know than other organizations” — shows you are a recluse candidate (driven by only one hidden OD agenda) — which I would add as The-Mole-in-VOTF-clue-number-9 to my list http://jp2m.blogspot.com/2008/01/john-paul-ii-clone-cardinal-george-and.html .
Aren’t you aware that SNAP and VOTF recently TOGETHER wrote a letter http://pope-ratz.blogspot.com/2008/01/snap-demands-cardinal-laws-resignation.html to Pope Benedict XVI demanding that Cardinal Bernard Law resign before the pope’s visit to USA this coming April ? You said that “demanding Cardinal George to resign is hollow, empty and meaningless” therefore, do you likewise find this unified letter of SNAP and VOTF to the pope hollow, empty and meaningless?
Janet Hauter, is your secret agenda to make VOTF the laity’s VOOP Voice of Opus Dei? And are you - and your team mates - going to always run to Mother Angelica for advice and pray at her Blood Diamond chapel ?
How many women members of VOTF can afford to wear a one-carat diamond ring or at least a 0.25 carat on their finger…while Mother Angelica has $50 Million worth of diamonds and jewels within her monastery in Alabama? complete article in http://jp2m.blogspot.com/2008/02/john-paul-ii-diamond-bride-mother.html
Paris Says:
February 11th, 2008 at 9:26 pm
Your comment is awaiting moderation.
Janet Hauter, you and your son George Bouchey owe VOTF the answer to this FUNDAMENTAL question:
#131 February 7th, 2008 at 8:22 am
Paris Arrow, author of The Mole in VOTF and Mother Angelica & VOTF in http://www.jp2m.blogspot.com question to Janet Hauter:
1) In your #130 reply (to my question #121) you said: "I make no judgements about correspondence from other organizations. I addressed only VOTF issues which I better know than other organizations" — shows you are a recluse candidate (driven by only one hidden OD agenda) — which I would add as The-Mole-in-VOTF-clue-number-9 to my list http://jp2m.blogspot.com/2008/01/john-paul-ii-clone-cardinal-george-and.html .
Aren't you aware that SNAP and VOTF recently TOGETHER wrote a letter http://pope-ratz.blogspot.com/2008/01/snap-demands-cardinal-laws-resignation.html to Pope Benedict XVI demanding that Cardinal Bernard Law resign before the pope's visit to USA this coming April ? You said that "demanding Cardinal George to resign is hollow, empty and meaningless" therefore, do you likewise find this unified letter of SNAP and VOTF to the pope hollow, empty and meaningless?
——
CHECKMATE– to Janet Hauter and team …and son George Bouchey -who has the most bitter voice and foul language in VOTF!
VOTF should be ashamed for having George Bouchey as a member and monopolizing in unChristian manner VOTF forums such as this)
Janet Hauter, why don't you simply withdraw your candidacy and spare the "muting" of VOTF by Benedict XVI & Opus Dei http://www.jp2m.blogspot.com/
Paris Says:
February 13th, 2008 at 7:26 am
Your comment is awaiting moderation.
Hey Janet Hauter, you - your team mates candidates -footsoldiers of Opus Dei and their Opus Dei blueprint for VOTF — and your son George Bouchey owe VOTF the answer to this FUNDAMENTAL question:
Question from A WEEK AGO
#131 February 7th, 2008 at 8:22 am
Paris Arrow, author of The Mole in VOTF and Mother Angelica & VOTF in http://www.jp2m.blogspot.com question to Janet Hauter:
1) In your #130 reply (to my question #121) you said: "I make no judgements about correspondence from other organizations. I addressed only VOTF issues which I better know than other organizations" — shows you are a recluse candidate (driven by only one hidden OD agenda) — which I would add as The-Mole-in-VOTF-clue-number-9 to my list http://jp2m.blogspot.com/2008/01/john-paul-ii-clone-cardinal-george-and.html .
Aren't you aware that SNAP and VOTF recently TOGETHER wrote a letter http://pope-ratz.blogspot.com/2008/01/snap-demands-cardinal-laws-resignation.html to Pope Benedict XVI demanding that Cardinal Bernard Law resign before the pope's visit to USA this coming April ? You said that "demanding Cardinal George to resign is hollow, empty and meaningless" therefore, do you likewise find this unified letter of SNAP and VOTF to the pope hollow, empty and meaningless?
Janet Hauter and team mates, why don't you simply withdraw your candidacy and spare the "muting" of VOTF by Benedict XVI & Opus Dei http://www.jp2m.blogspot.com/
How can VOTF "Keep the Faith and Change the Church" when - through you - it is the Voice of Opus Dei and its petrified forest 2,000 year old dogmas and doctrines?
----
george bouchey Says:
February 11th, 2008 at 9:10 pm
Tom et al,
Perhaps the principle to consider is related to the story about whether it is better to give people fish, and feed them for a day, or teach them to fish, and feed them for a lifetime.
I submit we have to do both without so concentrating on one that all others fall by the wayside. Consider honestly whether or not VotF can ever supply the support to victims/survivors that an organization like SNAP can. And there are other organizations with similar missions. Only supporting victims/survivors is akin to feeding the faithful for a day. Yes, it must be done. No, it is not enough in itself. Attempting to change the institution that victimized them is just as worthy a goal, and it must be attempted to eliminate as near as possible to none the future abuse of children. We may not see substantial results immediately, but like a long journey, it starts with a single step. When you look at the existing reform orgs, VotF is the one with a unique and balanced program.
If you want a balanced program, it is neceasary to have a balanced administration and membership. "There's no free lunch, you get what you pay for, and nothin's gonna come in the mail"
georgebouchey@comcast.net
-------
The son of Janet Hauter campaigning on the last day of VOTF election of National Officers: George Bouchey's February 24's posts. George wanted to have the last word and he got it. We posted how George is a major sign of The Mole in VOTF
Author: george bouchey
Comment:
How drol is the last comment from PK! Even amusing!! At last it is disclosed that the knowledge of "ad hominem'' is known to the leader of the select group breathing the rareified and negative charged air of the NE.
It's hard to be a "wannabe". So difficult to be beyond the fringe of membership in the once scorned organizatiion to which one can only re-aspire as one who once was, is not and never will be!
Many are called, few are chosen, even fewer re-chosen. C'est le vie! Au revoir!!
Author: Marie Tupper
Comment:
George Bouchey's ramblings are intolerable. In fact, they are childish and immature. Paul Kendrick has asked sincere and reasonable questions about the integrity of the 2008 election process. If there is, indeed, election fraud by VOTF officials, then those who participated must be held accountable and responsible for their actions.
I would have some respect Mr. Bouchey if he responded to the issues at hand. Perhaps, Mr Bouchey's time would be better spent if he called upon VOTF national leadership to issue a statement in response to the allegations of election fraud.
Marie Tupper
Author: george bouchey
Comment:
Droll, to Droller! First claim there is a RUMOUR
Author: george bouchey
Comment:
Droll to Droller! First claim there is a rumor? of election fraud. Then assign the rumored? fraud to a particular group. Then demand the group explain the rumor?, which may or may not have existed at all. Is there something termed circular illogic?
By the way, there are those, who if I had their respect, I would be suspicious I had done something wrong.
Last day to vote, and this madness ends. How have you been holding up under the suspense? Will the "maries" PK become a member? Will the SSWG take over and reduce our task by eliminating two Goals? Will PK run for the NCR? For President?! Stay tuned!!!
Author: Bob Schwiderski, National Representative
Comment:
I am simply amased this type of grap is being injected into the thought of this organization !
George Bouchey, the member with no affiliate, is to me, an injector of doom and gloom. Only an organizational wart keep injecting this crap: "Will the SSWG take over and reduce our task by eliminating two Goals? George Bouchy "
With feelings you have personal tendencies which lean heavily on the ego maniac side of life -- I mentioned over a week ago that his posts would return - just so he could pat himself on his back when he put his nite cap on -- george got the last word.
Have at it george -- feed more cancer all afternoon and this evening. VOTF needs more from the member without an affiliate - why, because none wants him.
Author: george bouchey
Comment:
:-)
------
February 23 questions to some fishy on the newly elected presidnet Dan Bartley, Janet Hauter's team
Author: Paul Kendrick
Comment:
Someone in the national leadership of Voice of the Faithful is "leaking" the "real time" vote count to the Dan Bartley campaign.
"I have been told by a member of the national leadership that as of Sunday the votes for the two Presidential candidates are VERY close. There is much at stake and EVERY VOTE COUNTS."
Joan Bedosky, Long Island VOTF 2/19/2008
Who in "national leadership" is "leaking" the real time vote count?
"In my role as 'LIVOTF Membership Communications', I have a policy of neutrality on all communications I send to our general membership on behalf of the Board of Directors. That is the way I see my responsibility.
"Now I want to step out of that role and personally ask you to "Get out the votes" for Dan Bartley as the new President of Voice of the Faithful. I urge you to do so because this election is so critical to the future of VOTF."
Joan Bedosky, LI VOTF
Author: Mary Farmer
Comment:
In reply to post re: supposed "leak," perhaps there is no "leak," just readily available info. Or perhaps it came from the same person who gave the VOTF membership info to the SSWG candidates to send out unsolicited campaign e-mails. I am a member of VOTF and, had this question been posed by another VOTF member, perhaps it would merit a reply but it was not and it does not, as far as I am concerned.
BTW, I wonder how that non-member got a copy of Joan B's communique to members? Hmmm...just another attempt to disrupt and undermine. Let's just let the election process play out and pray we remain Christ-centered and 3 goal oriented.
Author: Paul Kendrick
Comment:
Dear Ms. Farmer,
My question still stands, your ad hominum comments withstanding.
It is interesting to note that instead of responding to the question I posed, you are attempting to disparage the VOTF member who forwarded the email to others when he or she determined that something is very much amiss in the voting process.
It is now documented that Dan Bartley and Kevin Connors have had access to up to the minute voting results and other candidates have not.
I am sure you will agree that the secret information they have received provides them with an unfair edge in the election.
The question I have asked is reasonable.
Who is the person(s) who is leaking the vote tallies?
This malfeasance is further proof that the Archdiocese of Voice of the Faithful is alive and well. There is a hierarchy, there is secrecy, there is a lack of openness and transparency. Lay clericalism is rampant.
Paul Kendrick
Co-founder, VOTF Maine
------
The newly elected officers of VOTF
(secret members of Opus Dei)
PRESIDENT Dan Bartley
VICE-PRESIDENT
Janet Hauter
TREASURER
Kevin Connors
SECRETARY
Julie McConville
------
These candidates were endorsed by Fr. Tom Doyle
(of course they didn't win)
Kristine Ward - President
David Biersmith -- Vice-President
-------
Paris Arrows' comment on Kevin Connor campaign. He was elected Treasurer!
Note that this candidate does not mention one iota about supporting victims of clergy abuse. This candidate is a footsoldier for Opus Dei blueprint for VOTF --- it's all about "the Church into the 21st century" and "The right of woman to equal treatment in the Church and Elimination of mandatory clerical celibacy..blah blah blah...barking on petrified forest 2,000 year old dogmas and doctrines
The Opus Dei just want VOTF to keep barking -- lots of empty words...nothing of substance....nothing for SNAP... and nothing for victims of church abuse.
The Opus Dei want total rule and autocracy through the pope and dogmas and doctrines. There is no freedom of speech and the VOTF will become nothing but a barking dog tied on Octopus Dei leash!
Kevin Connor's campaign for Treasurer
It's Your Decision. But Here's Why You Should Vote For Me
To serve effectively as your Treasurer and Chief Financial Officer, a candidate must bring with him or her proven experience, knowledge, and technical skills. I have all of these essential skill sets, and I urge you to vote for me as your next Treasurer.
Along with an MBA Degree and experience as an management lecturer in residence at a southern university, I have been a businessman and consultant for 40 years. During the past 5 years, I served as Treasurer and Finance Committee co-chair of VOTF's largest affiliate. I've had the good fortune to experience first hand in my VOTF positions virtually all of the issues that face your Treasurer. And with our strong management team on Long Island, which includes your candidate for president Dan Bartley, I have been successful time and time again. Remember your Treasurer is not a cheerleader. He or she is responsible for building, nurturing and managing the financial resources that are necessary for VOTF to carry out its mission and achieve its goals.
Beyond finances, I've played an active planning role with Long Island VOTF. I am particularly interested in reaching out beyond our membership to the broader faith community, including organizations of like mind, to form consensus and pursue our goals. I believe VOTF can and should lead the charge for developing consensus on the following:
How to bring the Church into the 21st century
Financial reporting and transparency
Establishing an elected, Representative Diocesan Finance Council in every Diocese in the nation
The right of woman to equal treatment in the Church
Elimination of mandatory clerical celibacy; and tenure, vesting and guaranteed pensions for priests
Legislation to protect the rights of the abused
I would appreciate receiving your vote for Treasurer
Paris Arrow Says:
February 12th, 2008 at 9:14 pm
You are barking at a 2,000 year old dogma on "mandatory clerical celibacy"…remember the boy who cried wolf! wolf! wolf!
--------------------
Author: jo williams
Comment:
I am interested in knowing from the candidates for president what leadership you have taken to advance the extension/repeal of the statute of limitations for victims of child abuse in your state and within your chapter. I will not vote for anyone who thinks the problem is solved, fixed, or in any way lessened by the passage of time or the passage of such legislation in some states.
------
Author: Paul Kendrick
Comment:
Integrity of Election Procedures
To: VOTF 2008 National Elections Committee:
Margaret Roylance, Massachusetts, Chair, Anne Wilson, New York, Ginny Hoehne, Ohio, Vince Grenough, Kentucky, Joe Juhasz, Colorado, Robert Rowden, California
Re: Election Procedures
The VOTF election committee has employed www.Campus-Vote.com to administer the current election of VOTF officers (www.campus-vote.com).
Campus-vote.com offers web-based voting and surveys for professional organizations and faculty/student governments.
Here’s my question: does any person (or persons) other than representatives of www.Campus-Vote.com have access to “real time” election voting results? In other words, does any member of the VOTF election committee, VOTF’s current officers and trustees, VOTF’s Executive Director, or anyone other than official representatives of www.Campus-Vote.com have access to current, updated (real time), election results?
It is interesting to note that Campus-Vote.com addresses the issue of potential conflict of interest on their web site.
“Many of our clients prefer our experienced staff (we've run hundreds of elections) to act as an independent third party to administer their election and make sure that everything goes smoothly…(otherwise) you may have…to deal with potential controversies over the procedures and results.”
Here’s the scary part (from Campus-Vote web site) “As election administrator, you can also view the current vote counts. http://www.campus-vote.com/webware74/wwwexam/display-votes.html”
So, the question is: Who is the “election administrator? Who has access to the up to the minute (real time) vote tally?
Lay clericalism is rampant in VOTF, especially among the current slate of officers and trustees. Can you imagine a scenario in which the “Election Administrator” keeps certain candidates informed of the ongoing vote count? There are those who might think they are doing what’s best for VOTF by helping certain candidates get elected.
-------Questions asked (unanswered) to elected Jim Jenkins
Author: Paul Kendrick
Comment:
To: Mr. Joseph Juhasz
Last week, I posted a question on this site for Mr. Joseph Juhasz (see copy below).
Mr. Juhasz is a member of the VOTF National Representative Council and most recently served as moderator of the three candidate dabates.
In my own diocese, it is typical for the bishop and his spokesperson not to respond to questions that are either damaging to them or are so uncomfortable that, in their minds, they have only two options. They can either lie or not respond at all.
Mostly, they choose not to respond.
Unfortunately (sadly?), Mr. Juhasz has, like a bishop, chosen not to respond to my question.
Incidents like this affirm my thesis that VOTF has become the church it is trying to change.
It is documented that VOTF has a hierarchy, it is engaged in secrecy, it lacks openness and transparency. It has become, with the help of VOTF members like Joseph Juhasz, the Archdiocese of Voice of the Faithful.
If this were not so, VOTF leaders such as Mr. Juhasz would not hesitate to respond to any and all questions.
Ad Majorem Dei Gloriam.
Sincerely,
Paul Kendrick
Co-Founder, VOTF Maine
__________________________
COPY
February 8th, 2008 at 11:34 am
Dear Mr. Juhasz,
I have been watching the candidate debates with great interest. I applaud your efforts to keep things moving so that as many questions as possible are asked of the candidates.
I hope you have a moment to respond to a question.
You may not have realized it, but before the last debate began, a conversation between Margaret Roylance (it sounded like her) and you could be heard via the audio transmission. Margaret was going through the list of questions for the candidates that were submitted by viewers of the telecast (and audio portion).
Margaret was overheard to say, “we can ignore questions from those people.”
In your capacity as moderator, Mr.Juhasz, did you censor certain questions based on
the identity of the person (or persons) who submitted the question?
Thank you for your time.
Author: jjenkins
Comment:
Since he specifically mentioned my name (posting #164), I think I should comment on Board of Trustee member Dan Sullivan’s statement about my request for financial information.
Quite frankly, I am astonished that I am the only candidate, standing for election as VOICEotf Treasurer, who has made inquiries regarding the current financial status of the organization.
As a candidate for Treasurer, I have received numerous inquiries from members about VOICEotf’s current financial status (and what I am going to do about it!).
Rather than engage in wanton speculation, I prefer to base any statements I would make on good solid, current information. VOICEotf would be ill served with anything less.
Actually, all candidates should have been provided with solid, current, accurate financial data so that we could responsibly represent VOICEotf to the membership and the public.
Am I “satisfied” with the response, as Dan Sullivan suggests? Yes and no. Not really.
The requested information (regarding income/expenses/cash on hand) that has been made available to me is dated, and not really current. (As a member of the NRC, I did received summary reports at our October 2007 which were predated then and not reflective of activity since and including the Providence convocation.)
Of course, the proverbial “elephant under the rug” is that whomever the newly elected officers may be, whatever initiatives they will want to espouse, their ability to deliver to the membership will be severely constrained by the current financial status of VOICEotf for the foreseeable future.
I am committed to TRANSPARENCY and ACCOUNTABILITY to VOICEotf membership regarding our all of our financial affairs. We need to MODEL how we expect the church to act with accountability and transparency.
I am committed to spearheading renewed and reenergized FUNDRAISING EFFORTS to support and underwrite our advocacy agenda for a new church in a new century.
Beyond this, I want to “BUILD the VOICE,” build with the membership a strong partnership, commitment and responsibility for our collective resources.
Each VOICEotf member needs to be educated to prophetic STEWARDSHIP of our mission and goals.
I ask for your vote. BUILD the VOICE!
Jim Jenkins
Candidate for VOICEotf Treasurer
Author: Lisa Braglia
Comment:
This question is for Mr. Jenkins and all the other candidates who have access to the latest financial information:
It would seem from Jim Jenkins' response that the financial information he received is more recent than that posted on the VOTF website. Would anyone who has access to this updated information be willing to share it with the membership, and would anyone be willing to tell us why this updated information hasn't been posted to the VOTF website so that the membership might have access to it?
Thank you.
Author: Marie Tupper
Comment:
Two recent posts regarding financial accountability from VOTF trustees is alarming. I am particularly interested in knowing why Keven Connors, candidate for treasurer, has not asked for a current, up to date financial statement.
I am equally concerned that Dan Bartley, candidate for president, is in possession of this information (because he is a trustee) and is unwilling to release the aforementioned financial statement.
Let's put an end to all this nonsense right now.
Mr. Bartley, take some responsibility here. Insist that an up to date financial statement is made available to all members by 5:00 PM tomorrow.
If you do not do this, Mr. Bartley, then you have painted yourself as a member of the secretive, authoritative VOTF hierarchy.
Mr. Connors, I ask the same of you in your capacity as candiadate for Treasurer of VOTF.
Sincerely,
Marie Tupper
VOTF member
4. The Opus Dei voice of Mother Angelica
The Mole has instinctively told us that she goes to Mother Angelica for advice which proves Angelica's control on VOTF. Our exposition of the hypocrisy of Mother Angelica is here.
Mother Angelica's EWTN is all about the Holy Father and Holy Mass and holy canonizations by the Opus Dei popes. There is NOTHING about the voice of justice of victims of the John Paul II Pedophile Priests Army.
So with Opus Dei controlling EWTN and VOTF, all we can do is watch the Opus Dei power-hunger existence and also watch their own Opus Dei demise because the B16-OD Benedict XVI-Opus Dei Titanic Ship has been hit by a heaven-sent Galileo Iceberg right in the heart of Rome - the La Sapienza University science professors and students rejected and made Benedict XVI cancel his visit and speech on their opening school day last January -- We provided full coverage in our Benedict XVI website.
Benedict XVI-Opus Dei B16-OD Titanic Ship
It isn't the Catholics like us who will bring the Vatican Palace of Opus Dei into rubbles, it is God himself who sees and hears the cries of the 12,000 American children crying into heaven for the sins of the John Paul II Pedophile Priests Army -- whose sins WITHIN the EUCHARIST were covered-up by the Opus Dei and John Paul II and Benedict XVI.
The Opus Dei are like the Pharisees in Jesus' time -- they loved to parade their holiness and judged others as more "lowly" than them like Publicans. God does not sleep and justice will be served. The sin of cover-up of priest-pedophilia that Opus Dei did for more than a quarter of century with John Paul II and Benedict XVI will not go unpunished in this new century. Opus Dei has shown only cruelty -- no mercy -- to Jon Sobrino and Tom Doyle (to name a few) -- the Opus Dei too will have no mercy from heaven. Not even their Opus Dei founder St? Josemaria can salvage the Benedict XVI-Opus Dei B16-OD Titanic Ship from sinking in the heart of Rome......
Listen to Fr. Tom Doyle interviewed in YouTube
explaining how the Pope covered up clergy sexual abuse
Last year after Mahony paid off the $660 million to victims of hundreds of pedophile-priests he covered-up, we wrote this article which is fitting to reprint here because Janet Hauter and her team of newly elected VOTF Opus Dei officers will be official mouthpiece of the Octopus Dei for at least 2 years.
It is quite a coincidence that as we reveal for the first time the role of Opus Dei in the cover-up of the JPIIPPA John Paul II Pedophile Priests Army for more than 26 years these giant squids suddenly appear on the shores of southern California.
God is sending the sign (through these giant predators) to confirm that we are speaking the truth and nothing but the truth about the Octopus Dei who is the ultimate cover-upper of the priest pedophilia of the 20th century and is the modern predator in the Catholic church today.
Shame on the City of Angels as NOT ONE Los Angeles theologian raised his voice to denounce Cardinal Mahony and asked for his resignation. Shame on the City of Angels as representatives of SNAP and Catholics did not protest Cardinal Mahony's hypocrisy and demand him to step down and leave town. Shame on the City of Angels that has lost its sense of decency and justice - for the children who are least of the brethren of Christ who suffered the most heinous crime of priest pedophilia in the Catholic church in the 20th century.
We in Boston did our job well for the victims of the JPIIPPA John Paul II Pedophile Priests Army and we got rid of Cardinal Bernard Law (one of the commanders of the Third Reich of the JPIIPPA). Cardinal Law was not a good American citizen and so we did not want to see him walk in our Bostonian soil. We refused to hear his liar-voice preaching everyday in our diocese and churches . It was not a surprise that John Paul II took him to Rome to join his other cohorts-in-crime, JPII clones Benedict XVI and Opus Dei eunuchs, Masters of Deceit at the Vatican (prime Opus Dei real estate)where they continue to rule amidst pompous ceremonies like the Tsars using their OD cunning tentacles.
Shame on the City of Angels so immune to sex that it clasps the 508 pedophile priests and kowtow to Cardinal Mahony, Master of Cunning and Deceit. The City of Angels breaths easy amidst LA landscape stenched with sex. Perhaps this is not a surprise as Hollywood reels with sex films; and the Catholic church seething with the JPIIPPA John Paul II Pedophile Priests Army blends well into the sex scene.
Video of giant squids off California coast http://cbs11tv.com/pets/local_story_093132302.html
"They feed like a pack of wolves, and what they'll do is they will force their prey to the surface." (Opus Dei preys on anyone who demand justice for the poor and the downtrodden and who dares point out the truth about their secretive OD schemes.)
"And they just get themselves into an absolute feeding frenzy. These things are literally eating machines." (Opus Dei are literally eating machines on anyone who speaks the truth like the Jesuits).
"Giant squid make for good eating (like Opus Dei may look good in Latin Mass and in their piety). They can be broiled, baked, fried or barbecued. And are considered a delicacy. Just know they are also cannibalistic..." (right, cannibalistic like the holy Opus Dei who mauls on their prey the Jesuits - e.g. Jon Sobrino who has given his entire life to serve the poor people of El Salvador was silenced and prohibited to publish and teach -- by the Opus Dei Bishop who wouldn't dare dirty his hands to serve the poor).
See May 7, 2007 of http://pope-ratz.blogspot.com/
for the complete story on Jon Sobrino.
"The squids have been described as looking 'like aliens'" (like Opus Dei holy aliens)
"They get up to about 100 pounds, (and) eight feet long! Eight feet of fighting fury".
Hell knows no fury like the Opus Dei scorned.
(Images: Getty, BBC,AP)
http://mondopulpo.blogspot.com/2005/10/octopus-stencil-octopus-dei.html
posted by Paris Arrow | Tuesday, February 26, 2008
0 Comments:
Post a Comment
<< Home